Zhejiang vs Henan Songshan Longmen
Zhejiang and Henan Songshan Longmen Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Zhejiang and Henan Songshan Longmen : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Zhejiang and Henan Songshan Longmen , Zhejiang 's overall team strength is rated at 170, while Henan Songshan Longmen 's is 136. In home matches, Zhejiang 's team strength drops to 150, whereas Henan Songshan Longmen displays a team strength of 90 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 20% | 0% | Corners Won | 60% | 47% |
| 80% | 100% | Corners Lost | 54% | 4% |
| 9.22 | 6.75 | Avg. Corners | 11.00 | 9.75 |
| 3.89 | 2.50 | Corners For | 5.80 | 4.75 |
| 5.23 | 4.25 | Corners Against | 5.20 | 4.94 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% | 50% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 75% | 50% | + 5.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 75% | 50% | + 6.5 | 100% | 67% |
| 55% | 50% | + 7.5 | 80% | 57% |
| 43% | 25% | + 8.5 | 80% | 57% |
| 43% | 25% | + 9.5 | 80% | 57% |
| 43% | 25% | + 10.5 | 40% | 37% |
| 33% | 25% | + 11.5 | 20% | 10% |
| 20% | 0% | + 12.5 | 20% | 10% |
| 10% | 0% | + 13.5 | 20% | 10% |
| 10% | 0% | + 14.5 | 20% | 10% |
| 10% | 0% | + 15.5 | 20% | 10% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 75% | 50% | + 1.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 65% | 50% | + 2.5 | 100% | 67% |
| 43% | 25% | + 3.5 | 100% | 67% |
| 33% | 25% | + 4.5 | 80% | 57% |
| 20% | 0% | + 5.5 | 60% | 30% |
| 20% | 0% | + 6.5 | 20% | 10% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 1.5 | 100% | 84% |
| 88% | 75% | + 2.5 | 100% | 84% |
| 65% | 50% | + 3.5 | 80% | 74% |
| 65% | 50% | + 4.5 | 40% | 37% |
| 33% | 25% | + 5.5 | 40% | 37% |
| 33% | 25% | + 6.5 | 20% | 27% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10% | 0% | - 1.5 | 40% | 37% |
| 10% | 0% | - 2.5 | 0% | 17% |
| 0% | 0% | - 3.5 | 0% | 17% |
| 0% | 0% | - 4.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 0% | 0% | - 5.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 33% | 25% | + 1.5 | 100% | 67% |
| 80% | 100% | + 2.5 | 100% | 84% |
| 90% | 100% | + 3.5 | 100% | 84% |
| 90% | 100% | + 4.5 | 100% | 84% |
| 0% | 100% | + 5.5 | 100% | 0% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shenhua | 23 | - | 8-3 |
| 2. Chengdu | 20 | - | - |
| 3. Port | 17 | - | - |
| 4. Beijing | 16 | - | 10-8 |
| 5. Shandong | 16 | - | - |
| 6. Tianjin | 13 | - | 3-4 |
| 7. Qingdao | 12 | 1-3 | - |
| 8. Zhejiang | 12 | - | - |
| 9. Meizhou | 12 | 3-5 | - |
| 10. Dalian Yingbo | 10 | 5-7 | - |
| 11. Yunnan Yukun | 9 | - | 5-8 |
| 12. Three Towns | 8 | - | 5-2 |
| 13. Henan | 7 | - | - |
| 14. Shenzhen | 7 | 1-2 | - |
| 15. Changchun | 5 | - | - |
| 16. Hainiu | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Chengdu | 20 | - | - |
| 2. Beijing | 19 | - | 6-1 |
| 3. Zhejiang | 17 | - | - |
| 4. Port | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Tianjin | 14 | - | 1-3 |
| 6. Meizhou | 13 | 3-2 | - |
| 7. Shandong | 12 | - | - |
| 8. Dalian Yingbo | 12 | 3-3 | - |
| 9. Shenhua | 12 | - | 4-0 |
| 10. Henan | 11 | - | - |
| 11. Yunnan Yukun | 9 | - | 2-3 |
| 12. Hainiu | 9 | - | - |
| 13. Qingdao | 8 | 0-3 | - |
| 14. Changchun | 8 | - | - |
| 15. Three Towns | 8 | - | 3-0 |
| 16. Shenzhen | 3 | 1-2 | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shenhua | 22 | - | 4-3 |
| 2. Chengdu | 17 | - | - |
| 3. Qingdao | 15 | 1-0 | - |
| 4. Yunnan Yukun | 15 | - | 3-5 |
| 5. Tianjin | 14 | - | 2-1 |
| 6. Meizhou | 14 | 0-3 | - |
| 7. Beijing | 13 | - | 4-7 |
| 8. Shandong | 12 | - | - |
| 9. Dalian Yingbo | 12 | 2-4 | - |
| 10. Shenzhen | 11 | 0-0 | - |
| 11. Port | 11 | - | - |
| 12. Henan | 9 | - | - |
| 13. Zhejiang | 8 | - | - |
| 14. Three Towns | 8 | - | 2-2 |
| 15. Hainiu | 8 | - | - |
| 16. Changchun | 5 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shenhua | 23 | 2-9 | - |
| 2. Chengdu | 20 | - | - |
| 3. Port | 17 | - | - |
| 4. Beijing | 16 | - | 3-4 |
| 5. Shandong | 16 | - | 9-8 |
| 6. Tianjin | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Qingdao | 12 | 2-4 | - |
| 8. Zhejiang | 12 | - | - |
| 9. Meizhou | 12 | - | 4-6 |
| 10. Dalian Yingbo | 10 | - | 4-6 |
| 11. Yunnan Yukun | 9 | - | - |
| 12. Three Towns | 8 | - | - |
| 13. Henan | 7 | - | - |
| 14. Shenzhen | 7 | - | 6-5 |
| 15. Changchun | 5 | - | - |
| 16. Hainiu | 3 | 5-1 | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Chengdu | 20 | - | - |
| 2. Beijing | 19 | - | 0-0 |
| 3. Zhejiang | 17 | - | - |
| 4. Port | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Tianjin | 14 | - | - |
| 6. Meizhou | 13 | - | 3-4 |
| 7. Shandong | 12 | - | 7-3 |
| 8. Dalian Yingbo | 12 | - | 3-4 |
| 9. Shenhua | 12 | 1-3 | - |
| 10. Henan | 11 | - | - |
| 11. Yunnan Yukun | 9 | - | - |
| 12. Hainiu | 9 | 1-0 | - |
| 13. Qingdao | 8 | 2-3 | - |
| 14. Changchun | 8 | - | - |
| 15. Three Towns | 8 | - | - |
| 16. Shenzhen | 3 | - | 2-4 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shenhua | 22 | 1-6 | - |
| 2. Chengdu | 17 | - | - |
| 3. Qingdao | 15 | 0-1 | - |
| 4. Yunnan Yukun | 15 | - | - |
| 5. Tianjin | 14 | - | - |
| 6. Meizhou | 14 | - | 1-2 |
| 7. Beijing | 13 | - | 3-4 |
| 8. Shandong | 12 | - | 2-5 |
| 9. Dalian Yingbo | 12 | - | 1-2 |
| 10. Shenzhen | 11 | - | 4-1 |
| 11. Port | 11 | - | - |
| 12. Henan | 9 | - | - |
| 13. Zhejiang | 8 | - | - |
| 14. Three Towns | 8 | - | - |
| 15. Hainiu | 8 | 4-1 | - |
| 16. Changchun | 5 | - | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.