Beijing vs Qingdao
Beijing and Qingdao Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Beijing and Qingdao : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Beijing and Qingdao , Beijing's overall team strength is rated at 216, while Qingdao 's is 180. In home matches, Beijing's team strength drops to 217, whereas Qingdao displays a team strength of 159 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 46% | 67% | Corners Won | 50% | 45% |
| 54% | 33% | Corners Lost | 20% | 2% |
| 11.57 | 12.33 | Avg. Corners | 6.00 | 7.29 |
| 5.86 | 7.00 | Corners For | 3.50 | 3.00 |
| 5.67 | 5.33 | Corners Against | 2.50 | 3.75 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 5.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 6.5 | 0% | 50% |
| 88% | 100% | + 7.5 | 0% | 30% |
| 88% | 100% | + 8.5 | 0% | 10% |
| 71% | 67% | + 9.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 42% | 33% | + 10.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 42% | 33% | + 11.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 29% | 33% | + 12.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 29% | 33% | + 13.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 29% | 33% | + 14.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 17% | 33% | + 15.5 | 0% | 0% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 1.5 | 100% | 80% |
| 88% | 100% | + 2.5 | 100% | 80% |
| 71% | 67% | + 3.5 | 50% | 55% |
| 59% | 67% | + 4.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 59% | 67% | + 5.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 59% | 67% | + 6.5 | 0% | 0% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 71% | 67% | + 1.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 71% | 67% | + 2.5 | 50% | 75% |
| 71% | 67% | + 3.5 | 0% | 30% |
| 71% | 67% | + 4.5 | 0% | 20% |
| 71% | 67% | + 5.5 | 0% | 20% |
| 71% | 67% | + 6.5 | 0% | 20% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46% | 67% | - 1.5 | 50% | 25% |
| 29% | 33% | - 2.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 29% | 33% | - 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 29% | 33% | - 4.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 29% | 33% | - 5.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 59% | 67% | + 1.5 | 100% | 80% |
| 59% | 67% | + 2.5 | 100% | 80% |
| 59% | 67% | + 3.5 | 100% | 80% |
| 88% | 100% | + 4.5 | 100% | 80% |
| 29% | 100% | + 5.5 | 100% | 0% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shenhua | 20 | - | 8-2 |
| 2. Shandong | 16 | 8-1 | - |
| 3. Chengdu | 14 | 3-7 | - |
| 4. Port | 14 | - | - |
| 5. Beijing | 13 | - | - |
| 6. Tianjin | 10 | - | 8-4 |
| 7. Qingdao | 9 | - | - |
| 8. Zhejiang | 9 | 10-8 | - |
| 9. Dalian Yingbo | 9 | - | - |
| 10. Yunnan Yukun | 8 | - | 0-7 |
| 11. Meizhou | 8 | - | - |
| 12. Shenzhen | 6 | - | - |
| 13. Three Towns | 5 | - | 8-7 |
| 14. Henan | 4 | - | - |
| 15. Changchun | 4 | - | - |
| 16. Hainiu | 2 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Beijing | 16 | - | - |
| 2. Zhejiang | 15 | 6-1 | - |
| 3. Chengdu | 14 | 2-1 | - |
| 4. Port | 13 | - | - |
| 5. Henan | 11 | - | - |
| 6. Shandong | 11 | 3-1 | - |
| 7. Shenhua | 11 | - | 4-1 |
| 8. Tianjin | 10 | - | 6-3 |
| 9. Meizhou | 9 | - | - |
| 10. Three Towns | 8 | - | 2-5 |
| 11. Yunnan Yukun | 8 | - | 0-3 |
| 12. Dalian Yingbo | 8 | - | - |
| 13. Changchun | 7 | - | - |
| 14. Qingdao | 6 | - | - |
| 15. Hainiu | 6 | - | - |
| 16. Shenzhen | 2 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shenhua | 19 | - | 4-1 |
| 2. Chengdu | 13 | 1-6 | - |
| 3. Yunnan Yukun | 13 | - | 0-4 |
| 4. Beijing | 12 | - | - |
| 5. Qingdao | 12 | - | - |
| 6. Shandong | 12 | 5-0 | - |
| 7. Dalian Yingbo | 12 | - | - |
| 8. Tianjin | 11 | - | 2-1 |
| 9. Meizhou | 11 | - | - |
| 10. Port | 10 | - | - |
| 11. Shenzhen | 8 | - | - |
| 12. Henan | 5 | - | - |
| 13. Zhejiang | 5 | 4-7 | - |
| 14. Three Towns | 5 | - | 6-2 |
| 15. Hainiu | 5 | - | - |
| 16. Changchun | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shenhua | 20 | - | - |
| 2. Shandong | 16 | 4-4 | - |
| 3. Chengdu | 14 | - | - |
| 4. Port | 14 | 1-8 | - |
| 5. Beijing | 13 | - | - |
| 6. Qingdao | 12 | - | - |
| 7. Tianjin | 10 | 4-3 | - |
| 8. Zhejiang | 9 | - | - |
| 9. Yunnan Yukun | 9 | - | - |
| 10. Dalian Yingbo | 9 | 1-7 | - |
| 11. Meizhou | 8 | - | - |
| 12. Henan | 7 | - | 2-4 |
| 13. Shenzhen | 6 | - | - |
| 14. Changchun | 5 | - | - |
| 15. Three Towns | 5 | 4-3 | - |
| 16. Hainiu | 2 | - | 3-3 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Beijing | 16 | - | - |
| 2. Zhejiang | 15 | - | - |
| 3. Chengdu | 14 | - | - |
| 4. Port | 13 | 0-4 | - |
| 5. Henan | 11 | - | 2-3 |
| 6. Shandong | 11 | 3-2 | - |
| 7. Shenhua | 11 | - | - |
| 8. Tianjin | 10 | 1-2 | - |
| 9. Yunnan Yukun | 9 | - | - |
| 10. Dalian Yingbo | 9 | 1-1 | - |
| 11. Hainiu | 9 | - | 1-3 |
| 12. Meizhou | 9 | - | - |
| 13. Changchun | 8 | - | - |
| 14. Three Towns | 8 | 3-2 | - |
| 15. Qingdao | 7 | - | - |
| 16. Shenzhen | 2 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shenhua | 19 | - | - |
| 2. Qingdao | 15 | - | - |
| 3. Yunnan Yukun | 14 | - | - |
| 4. Chengdu | 13 | - | - |
| 5. Beijing | 12 | - | - |
| 6. Shandong | 12 | 1-2 | - |
| 7. Dalian Yingbo | 12 | 0-6 | - |
| 8. Tianjin | 11 | 3-1 | - |
| 9. Meizhou | 11 | - | - |
| 10. Port | 10 | 1-4 | - |
| 11. Henan | 8 | - | 0-1 |
| 12. Shenzhen | 8 | - | - |
| 13. Zhejiang | 5 | - | - |
| 14. Three Towns | 5 | 1-1 | - |
| 15. Hainiu | 5 | - | 2-0 |
| 16. Changchun | 4 | - | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Man City
Brighton
Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle
Man Utd
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham
Everton
Leicester
Crystal Palace
Ipswich
Wolves
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.