Pachuca vs Pumas
Pachuca and Pumas Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Pachuca and Pumas: Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Pachuca and Pumas, Pachuca's overall team strength is rated at 106, while Pumas's is 142. In home matches, Pachuca's team strength drops to 125, whereas Pumas displays a team strength of 125 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 58% | 58% | Corners Won | 42% | 50% |
| 29% | 25% | Corners Lost | 42% | 10% |
| 11.71 | 12.25 | Avg. Corners | 9.58 | 9.21 |
| 6.29 | 7.67 | Corners For | 4.67 | 4.96 |
| 5.42 | 4.58 | Corners Against | 4.92 | 4.25 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 5.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 96% | 92% | + 6.5 | 92% | 92% |
| 92% | 92% | + 7.5 | 58% | 71% |
| 75% | 75% | + 8.5 | 58% | 63% |
| 67% | 67% | + 9.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 54% | 58% | + 10.5 | 17% | 13% |
| 46% | 50% | + 11.5 | 17% | 9% |
| 33% | 33% | + 12.5 | 17% | 9% |
| 25% | 33% | + 13.5 | 17% | 9% |
| 17% | 25% | + 14.5 | 17% | 9% |
| 17% | 25% | + 15.5 | 8% | 4% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 88% | 100% | + 1.5 | 92% | 96% |
| 88% | 100% | + 2.5 | 83% | 88% |
| 79% | 83% | + 3.5 | 75% | 79% |
| 71% | 83% | + 4.5 | 50% | 59% |
| 71% | 83% | + 5.5 | 25% | 38% |
| 46% | 50% | + 6.5 | 8% | 17% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 96% |
| 92% | 83% | + 1.5 | 92% | 88% |
| 84% | 75% | + 2.5 | 92% | 80% |
| 71% | 58% | + 3.5 | 83% | 67% |
| 59% | 50% | + 4.5 | 42% | 42% |
| 33% | 33% | + 5.5 | 17% | 17% |
| 25% | 17% | + 6.5 | 8% | 8% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50% | 58% | - 1.5 | 25% | 42% |
| 38% | 50% | - 2.5 | 17% | 38% |
| 29% | 50% | - 3.5 | 17% | 25% |
| 25% | 42% | - 4.5 | 17% | 17% |
| 21% | 42% | - 5.5 | 8% | 13% |
| 71% | 75% | + 1.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 80% | 92% | + 2.5 | 83% | 88% |
| 80% | 92% | + 3.5 | 83% | 88% |
| 84% | 100% | + 4.5 | 83% | 88% |
| 21% | 100% | + 5.5 | 92% | 13% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Cruz Azul | 42 | 3-3 | 12-7 |
| 2. Toluca | 35 | 6-8 | - |
| 3. Tigres | 34 | - | 2-7 |
| 4. Monterrey | 31 | 8-1 | 13-1 |
| 5. Pumas | 31 | - | 4-6 |
| 6. San Luis | 30 | 7-11 | - |
| 7. Tijuana | 29 | - | 3-4 |
| 8. América | 27 | - | 4-4 |
| 9. Guadalajara | 25 | 14-6 | - |
| 10. Atlas | 22 | - | 5-7 |
| 11. León | 18 | - | 9-1 |
| 12. Juárez | 17 | 6-6 | - |
| 13. Necaxa | 15 | 3-5 | - |
| 14. Mazatlán | 14 | - | 8-0 |
| 15. Puebla | 14 | - | 5-6 |
| 16. Pachuca | 13 | - | - |
| 17. Querétaro | 12 | 10-1 | 5-8 |
| 18. Santos | 10 | - | 5-8 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Toluca | 36 | 3-4 | - |
| 2. Cruz Azul | 32 | 1-3 | 8-2 |
| 3. Monterrey | 31 | 7-1 | 8-1 |
| 4. San Luis | 28 | 4-5 | - |
| 5. Guadalajara | 25 | 2-3 | - |
| 6. Tigres | 24 | - | 1-4 |
| 7. Necaxa | 23 | 1-2 | - |
| 8. Pumas | 23 | - | 2-4 |
| 9. Tijuana | 22 | - | 2-2 |
| 10. León | 21 | - | 3-1 |
| 11. América | 20 | - | 2-1 |
| 12. Atlas | 20 | - | 2-2 |
| 13. Juárez | 18 | 1-5 | - |
| 14. Mazatlán | 18 | - | 2-0 |
| 15. Pachuca | 18 | - | - |
| 16. Santos | 16 | - | 3-5 |
| 17. Puebla | 13 | - | 2-3 |
| 18. Querétaro | 11 | 4-0 | 2-7 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Cruz Azul | 41 | 2-0 | 4-5 |
| 2. Tigres | 31 | - | 1-3 |
| 3. Pumas | 31 | - | 2-2 |
| 4. América | 30 | - | 2-3 |
| 5. Toluca | 27 | 3-4 | - |
| 6. Tijuana | 25 | - | 1-2 |
| 7. Monterrey | 24 | 1-0 | 5-0 |
| 8. Guadalajara | 24 | 12-3 | - |
| 9. San Luis | 22 | 3-6 | - |
| 10. Juárez | 19 | 5-1 | - |
| 11. Puebla | 19 | - | 3-3 |
| 12. Pachuca | 19 | - | - |
| 13. Necaxa | 18 | 2-3 | - |
| 14. Atlas | 18 | - | 3-5 |
| 15. León | 17 | - | 6-0 |
| 16. Querétaro | 16 | 6-1 | 3-1 |
| 17. Mazatlán | 12 | - | 6-0 |
| 18. Santos | 10 | - | 2-3 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Cruz Azul | 42 | 2-7 | - |
| 2. Toluca | 35 | - | 5-5 |
| 3. Tigres | 34 | 5-5 | - |
| 4. Monterrey | 31 | - | 4-2 |
| 5. Pumas | 31 | - | - |
| 6. San Luis | 30 | 7-3 | 6-1 |
| 7. Tijuana | 29 | 5-2 | - |
| 8. América | 27 | - | 4-3 |
| 9. Guadalajara | 25 | - | 5-4 |
| 10. Atlas | 22 | - | 4-5 |
| 11. León | 18 | 6-3 | - |
| 12. Juárez | 17 | - | 5-4 |
| 13. Necaxa | 15 | - | 3-4 |
| 14. Mazatlán | 14 | - | 4-6 |
| 15. Puebla | 14 | 7-4 | - |
| 16. Pachuca | 13 | 4-6 | 14-5 |
| 17. Querétaro | 12 | 8-1 | 1-6 |
| 18. Santos | 10 | - | 4-11 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Toluca | 36 | - | 2-4 |
| 2. Cruz Azul | 32 | 0-3 | - |
| 3. Monterrey | 31 | - | 1-1 |
| 4. San Luis | 28 | 2-1 | 2-1 |
| 5. Guadalajara | 25 | - | 2-2 |
| 6. Tigres | 24 | 0-3 | - |
| 7. Necaxa | 23 | - | 2-0 |
| 8. Pumas | 23 | - | - |
| 9. Tijuana | 22 | 1-0 | - |
| 10. León | 21 | 1-2 | - |
| 11. América | 20 | - | 1-3 |
| 12. Atlas | 20 | - | 3-1 |
| 13. Juárez | 18 | - | 2-2 |
| 14. Mazatlán | 18 | - | 1-1 |
| 15. Pachuca | 18 | 2-4 | 3-2 |
| 16. Santos | 16 | - | 4-4 |
| 17. Puebla | 13 | 2-3 | - |
| 18. Querétaro | 11 | 6-1 | 1-1 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Cruz Azul | 41 | 2-4 | - |
| 2. Tigres | 31 | 5-2 | - |
| 3. Pumas | 31 | - | - |
| 4. América | 30 | - | 3-0 |
| 5. Toluca | 27 | - | 3-1 |
| 6. Tijuana | 25 | 4-2 | - |
| 7. Monterrey | 24 | - | 3-1 |
| 8. Guadalajara | 24 | - | 3-2 |
| 9. San Luis | 22 | 5-2 | 4-0 |
| 10. Juárez | 19 | - | 3-2 |
| 11. Puebla | 19 | 5-1 | - |
| 12. Pachuca | 19 | 2-2 | 11-3 |
| 13. Necaxa | 18 | - | 1-4 |
| 14. Atlas | 18 | - | 1-4 |
| 15. León | 17 | 5-1 | - |
| 16. Querétaro | 16 | 2-0 | 0-5 |
| 17. Mazatlán | 12 | - | 3-5 |
| 18. Santos | 10 | - | 0-7 |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Man City
Brighton
Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle
Man Utd
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham
Everton
Leicester
Crystal Palace
Ipswich
Wolves
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.