Curico Unido vs Antofagasta
Curico Unido and Antofagasta Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Curico Unido and Antofagasta : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Curico Unido and Antofagasta , Curico Unido 's overall team strength is rated at 151, while Antofagasta 's is 126. In home matches, Curico Unido 's team strength drops to 188, whereas Antofagasta displays a team strength of 150 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 63% | 50% | Corners Won | 50% | 38% |
| 13% | 25% | Corners Lost | 50% | 4% |
| 8.63 | 7.75 | Avg. Corners | 10.00 | 9.63 |
| 5.25 | 4.50 | Corners For | 4.00 | 4.25 |
| 3.38 | 3.25 | Corners Against | 6.00 | 5.38 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 4.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 88% | 75% | + 5.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 63% | 50% | + 6.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 50% | 50% | + 7.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 50% | 50% | + 8.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 38% | 25% | + 9.5 | 50% | 50% |
| 38% | 25% | + 10.5 | 50% | 50% |
| 25% | 0% | + 11.5 | 25% | 38% |
| 13% | 0% | + 12.5 | 0% | 25% |
| 0% | 0% | + 13.5 | 0% | 25% |
| 0% | 0% | + 14.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 0% | 0% | + 15.5 | 0% | 0% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 100% | 100% | + 1.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 100% | 100% | + 2.5 | 50% | 63% |
| 63% | 50% | + 3.5 | 50% | 63% |
| 63% | 50% | + 4.5 | 50% | 50% |
| 38% | 25% | + 5.5 | 50% | 38% |
| 38% | 25% | + 6.5 | 25% | 25% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 100% | 100% | + 1.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 63% | 50% | + 2.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 25% | 25% | + 3.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 25% | 25% | + 4.5 | 100% | 88% |
| 25% | 25% | + 5.5 | 50% | 38% |
| 0% | 0% | + 6.5 | 50% | 38% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38% | 25% | - 1.5 | 25% | 25% |
| 38% | 25% | - 2.5 | 0% | 13% |
| 25% | 25% | - 3.5 | 0% | 13% |
| 25% | 25% | - 4.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 13% | 0% | - 5.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 100% | 100% | + 1.5 | 50% | 63% |
| 100% | 100% | + 2.5 | 50% | 63% |
| 100% | 100% | + 3.5 | 50% | 63% |
| 100% | 100% | + 4.5 | 50% | 75% |
| 13% | 100% | + 5.5 | 75% | 0% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Arica | 16 | - | 3-3 |
| 2. Deportes Copiapo | 15 | 3-3 | - |
| 3. Santiago Wanderers | 15 | - | - |
| 4. Recoleta | 14 | - | - |
| 5. D. Concepcion | 13 | 3-2 | - |
| 6. San Luis | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Cobreloa | 11 | - | - |
| 8. Rangers Talca | 10 | - | 2-5 |
| 9. Curico Unido | 10 | - | - |
| 10. U. de Concepcion | 10 | - | - |
| 11. Antofagasta | 9 | - | - |
| 12. Magallanes | 8 | 5-6 | - |
| 13. Santiago Morn. | 8 | - | 6-7 |
| 14. Santa Cruz | 7 | 7-2 | - |
| 15. Temuco | 6 | - | 3-9 |
| 16. San Felipe | 6 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Deportes Copiapo | 15 | 0-0 | - |
| 2. Cobreloa | 13 | - | - |
| 3. Curico Unido | 13 | - | - |
| 4. Santiago Wanderers | 12 | - | - |
| 5. Rangers Talca | 11 | - | 0-0 |
| 6. D. Concepcion | 11 | 0-0 | - |
| 7. Recoleta | 11 | - | - |
| 8. Santiago Morn. | 11 | - | 0-0 |
| 9. Temuco | 9 | - | 0-0 |
| 10. San Luis | 9 | - | - |
| 11. Magallanes | 8 | 0-0 | - |
| 12. Arica | 8 | - | 0-0 |
| 13. San Felipe | 8 | - | - |
| 14. U. de Concepcion | 8 | - | - |
| 15. Antofagasta | 6 | - | - |
| 16. Santa Cruz | 4 | 0-0 | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Arica | 16 | - | 0-0 |
| 2. Deportes Copiapo | 14 | 0-0 | - |
| 3. Recoleta | 14 | - | - |
| 4. Santiago Wanderers | 14 | - | - |
| 5. San Luis | 13 | - | - |
| 6. Antofagasta | 11 | - | - |
| 7. Cobreloa | 11 | - | - |
| 8. D. Concepcion | 11 | 0-0 | - |
| 9. Rangers Talca | 10 | - | 0-0 |
| 10. Curico Unido | 10 | - | - |
| 11. U. de Concepcion | 10 | - | - |
| 12. Santa Cruz | 9 | 0-0 | - |
| 13. Magallanes | 9 | 0-0 | - |
| 14. San Felipe | 8 | - | - |
| 15. Santiago Morn. | 7 | - | 0-0 |
| 16. Temuco | 5 | - | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Arica | 16 | 0-0 | - |
| 2. Deportes Copiapo | 15 | - | - |
| 3. Santiago Wanderers | 15 | - | 7-1 |
| 4. Recoleta | 14 | - | 5-7 |
| 5. D. Concepcion | 13 | 5-9 | - |
| 6. San Luis | 13 | - | 5-6 |
| 7. Cobreloa | 11 | - | 7-2 |
| 8. Rangers Talca | 10 | - | - |
| 9. Curico Unido | 10 | - | - |
| 10. U. de Concepcion | 10 | - | - |
| 11. Antofagasta | 9 | - | - |
| 12. Magallanes | 8 | - | - |
| 13. Santiago Morn. | 8 | - | - |
| 14. Santa Cruz | 7 | - | - |
| 15. Temuco | 6 | 4-5 | - |
| 16. San Felipe | 6 | 9-5 | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Deportes Copiapo | 15 | - | - |
| 2. Cobreloa | 13 | - | 0-0 |
| 3. Curico Unido | 13 | - | - |
| 4. Santiago Wanderers | 12 | - | 0-0 |
| 5. Rangers Talca | 11 | - | - |
| 6. D. Concepcion | 11 | 0-0 | - |
| 7. Recoleta | 11 | - | 0-0 |
| 8. Santiago Morn. | 11 | - | - |
| 9. Temuco | 9 | 0-0 | - |
| 10. San Luis | 9 | - | 0-0 |
| 11. Magallanes | 8 | - | - |
| 12. Arica | 8 | 0-0 | - |
| 13. San Felipe | 8 | 0-0 | - |
| 14. U. de Concepcion | 8 | - | - |
| 15. Antofagasta | 6 | - | - |
| 16. Santa Cruz | 4 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Arica | 16 | 0-0 | - |
| 2. Deportes Copiapo | 14 | - | - |
| 3. Recoleta | 14 | - | 0-0 |
| 4. Santiago Wanderers | 14 | - | 0-0 |
| 5. San Luis | 13 | - | 0-0 |
| 6. Antofagasta | 11 | - | - |
| 7. Cobreloa | 11 | - | 0-0 |
| 8. D. Concepcion | 11 | 0-0 | - |
| 9. Rangers Talca | 10 | - | - |
| 10. Curico Unido | 10 | - | - |
| 11. U. de Concepcion | 10 | - | - |
| 12. Santa Cruz | 9 | - | - |
| 13. Magallanes | 9 | - | - |
| 14. San Felipe | 8 | 0-0 | - |
| 15. Santiago Morn. | 7 | - | - |
| 16. Temuco | 5 | 0-0 | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.