Juárez vs Pachuca
Juárez and Pachuca Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Juárez and Pachuca: Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Juárez and Pachuca, Juárez's overall team strength is rated at 138, while Pachuca's is 148. In home matches, Juárez's team strength drops to 147, whereas Pachuca displays a team strength of 123 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 43% | 55% | Corners Won | 58% | 58% |
| 50% | 45% | Corners Lost | 29% | 7% |
| 10.17 | 9.18 | Avg. Corners | 11.17 | 11.71 |
| 4.71 | 4.18 | Corners For | 4.92 | 6.29 |
| 5.43 | 5.00 | Corners Against | 6.25 | 5.42 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96% | 91% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 92% | 91% | + 5.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 87% | 82% | + 6.5 | 100% | 96% |
| 75% | 64% | + 7.5 | 92% | 92% |
| 61% | 45% | + 8.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 49% | 36% | + 9.5 | 67% | 67% |
| 36% | 18% | + 10.5 | 50% | 54% |
| 36% | 18% | + 11.5 | 42% | 46% |
| 25% | 18% | + 12.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 21% | 18% | + 13.5 | 17% | 25% |
| 12% | 9% | + 14.5 | 8% | 17% |
| 9% | 9% | + 15.5 | 8% | 17% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87% | 82% | + 0.5 | 92% | 96% |
| 87% | 82% | + 1.5 | 75% | 88% |
| 83% | 73% | + 2.5 | 75% | 88% |
| 75% | 73% | + 3.5 | 75% | 79% |
| 57% | 45% | + 4.5 | 58% | 71% |
| 36% | 18% | + 5.5 | 58% | 71% |
| 21% | 18% | + 6.5 | 42% | 46% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 1.5 | 100% | 92% |
| 96% | 100% | + 2.5 | 92% | 84% |
| 75% | 64% | + 3.5 | 83% | 71% |
| 61% | 36% | + 4.5 | 67% | 59% |
| 45% | 27% | + 5.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 20% | 9% | + 6.5 | 33% | 25% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30% | 36% | - 1.5 | 42% | 50% |
| 17% | 18% | - 2.5 | 25% | 38% |
| 9% | 18% | - 3.5 | 8% | 29% |
| 5% | 9% | - 4.5 | 8% | 25% |
| 5% | 9% | - 5.5 | 0% | 21% |
| 59% | 55% | + 1.5 | 67% | 71% |
| 71% | 64% | + 2.5 | 67% | 80% |
| 79% | 73% | + 3.5 | 67% | 80% |
| 87% | 82% | + 4.5 | 67% | 84% |
| 5% | 82% | + 5.5 | 75% | 21% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Cruz Azul | 42 | - | 5-0 |
| 2. Toluca | 35 | - | 7-3 |
| 3. Tigres | 34 | 0-4 | - |
| 4. Monterrey | 31 | - | 3-6 |
| 5. Pumas | 31 | 5-4 | - |
| 6. San Luis | 30 | 4-3 | - |
| 7. Tijuana | 29 | 5-3 | 5-4 |
| 8. América | 27 | 4-6 | 2-5 |
| 9. Guadalajara | 25 | - | 6-7 |
| 10. Atlas | 22 | 2-5 | - |
| 11. León | 18 | 10-4 | 9-6 |
| 12. Juárez | 17 | - | - |
| 13. Necaxa | 15 | - | 5-3 |
| 14. Mazatlán | 14 | 4-14 | 6-6 |
| 15. Puebla | 14 | - | 9-8 |
| 16. Pachuca | 13 | - | 6-6 |
| 17. Querétaro | 12 | - | 7-5 |
| 18. Santos | 10 | - | 6-8 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Toluca | 36 | - | 5-1 |
| 2. Cruz Azul | 32 | - | 1-0 |
| 3. Monterrey | 31 | - | 2-4 |
| 4. San Luis | 28 | 0-1 | - |
| 5. Guadalajara | 25 | - | 2-1 |
| 6. Tigres | 24 | 0-2 | - |
| 7. Necaxa | 23 | - | 1-1 |
| 8. Pumas | 23 | 2-2 | - |
| 9. Tijuana | 22 | 1-1 | 2-4 |
| 10. León | 21 | 6-1 | 5-4 |
| 11. América | 20 | 3-2 | 0-2 |
| 12. Atlas | 20 | 1-0 | - |
| 13. Juárez | 18 | - | - |
| 14. Mazatlán | 18 | 1-9 | 2-5 |
| 15. Pachuca | 18 | - | 1-5 |
| 16. Santos | 16 | - | 4-6 |
| 17. Puebla | 13 | - | 3-4 |
| 18. Querétaro | 11 | - | 5-4 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Cruz Azul | 41 | - | 4-0 |
| 2. Tigres | 31 | 0-2 | - |
| 3. Pumas | 31 | 3-2 | - |
| 4. América | 30 | 1-4 | 2-3 |
| 5. Toluca | 27 | - | 2-2 |
| 6. Tijuana | 25 | 4-2 | 3-0 |
| 7. Monterrey | 24 | - | 1-2 |
| 8. Guadalajara | 24 | - | 4-6 |
| 9. San Luis | 22 | 4-2 | - |
| 10. Juárez | 19 | - | - |
| 11. Puebla | 19 | - | 6-4 |
| 12. Pachuca | 19 | - | 5-1 |
| 13. Necaxa | 18 | - | 4-2 |
| 14. Atlas | 18 | 1-5 | - |
| 15. León | 17 | 4-3 | 4-2 |
| 16. Querétaro | 16 | - | 2-1 |
| 17. Mazatlán | 12 | 3-5 | 4-1 |
| 18. Santos | 10 | - | 2-2 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Cruz Azul | 42 | 3-3 | 12-7 |
| 2. Toluca | 35 | 6-8 | - |
| 3. Tigres | 34 | - | 2-7 |
| 4. Monterrey | 31 | 8-1 | 13-1 |
| 5. Pumas | 31 | - | 4-6 |
| 6. San Luis | 30 | 7-11 | - |
| 7. Tijuana | 29 | - | 3-4 |
| 8. América | 27 | - | 4-4 |
| 9. Guadalajara | 25 | 14-6 | - |
| 10. Atlas | 22 | - | 5-7 |
| 11. León | 18 | - | 9-1 |
| 12. Juárez | 17 | 6-6 | - |
| 13. Necaxa | 15 | 3-5 | - |
| 14. Mazatlán | 14 | - | 8-0 |
| 15. Puebla | 14 | - | 5-6 |
| 16. Pachuca | 13 | - | - |
| 17. Querétaro | 12 | 10-1 | 5-8 |
| 18. Santos | 10 | - | 5-8 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Toluca | 36 | 3-4 | - |
| 2. Cruz Azul | 32 | 1-3 | 8-2 |
| 3. Monterrey | 31 | 7-1 | 8-1 |
| 4. San Luis | 28 | 4-5 | - |
| 5. Guadalajara | 25 | 2-3 | - |
| 6. Tigres | 24 | - | 1-4 |
| 7. Necaxa | 23 | 1-2 | - |
| 8. Pumas | 23 | - | 2-4 |
| 9. Tijuana | 22 | - | 2-2 |
| 10. León | 21 | - | 3-1 |
| 11. América | 20 | - | 2-1 |
| 12. Atlas | 20 | - | 2-2 |
| 13. Juárez | 18 | 1-5 | - |
| 14. Mazatlán | 18 | - | 2-0 |
| 15. Pachuca | 18 | - | - |
| 16. Santos | 16 | - | 3-5 |
| 17. Puebla | 13 | - | 2-3 |
| 18. Querétaro | 11 | 4-0 | 2-7 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Cruz Azul | 41 | 2-0 | 4-5 |
| 2. Tigres | 31 | - | 1-3 |
| 3. Pumas | 31 | - | 2-2 |
| 4. América | 30 | - | 2-3 |
| 5. Toluca | 27 | 3-4 | - |
| 6. Tijuana | 25 | - | 1-2 |
| 7. Monterrey | 24 | 1-0 | 5-0 |
| 8. Guadalajara | 24 | 12-3 | - |
| 9. San Luis | 22 | 3-6 | - |
| 10. Juárez | 19 | 5-1 | - |
| 11. Puebla | 19 | - | 3-3 |
| 12. Pachuca | 19 | - | - |
| 13. Necaxa | 18 | 2-3 | - |
| 14. Atlas | 18 | - | 3-5 |
| 15. León | 17 | - | 6-0 |
| 16. Querétaro | 16 | 6-1 | 3-1 |
| 17. Mazatlán | 12 | - | 6-0 |
| 18. Santos | 10 | - | 2-3 |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Man City
Brighton
Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle
Man Utd
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham
Everton
Leicester
Crystal Palace
Ipswich
Wolves
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.