Lommel vs RFB
Lommel and RFB Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Lommel and RFB: Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Lommel and RFB, Lommel's overall team strength is rated at 143, while RFB's is 132. In home matches, Lommel's team strength drops to 128, whereas RFB displays a team strength of 129 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 33% | 29% | Corners Won | 43% | 41% |
| 57% | 57% | Corners Lost | 52% | 14% |
| 8.46 | 7.36 | Avg. Corners | 9.57 | 9.26 |
| 3.61 | 3.29 | Corners For | 4.64 | 4.44 |
| 4.86 | 4.07 | Corners Against | 4.93 | 4.81 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97% | 100% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 79% | 71% | + 5.5 | 93% | 93% |
| 65% | 50% | + 6.5 | 79% | 82% |
| 61% | 43% | + 7.5 | 71% | 70% |
| 50% | 29% | + 8.5 | 64% | 55% |
| 32% | 21% | + 9.5 | 50% | 44% |
| 18% | 14% | + 10.5 | 43% | 29% |
| 11% | 7% | + 11.5 | 21% | 18% |
| 7% | 0% | + 12.5 | 7% | 11% |
| 7% | 0% | + 13.5 | 7% | 11% |
| 7% | 0% | + 14.5 | 7% | 4% |
| 4% | 0% | + 15.5 | 7% | 4% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 93% | 86% | + 1.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 68% | 64% | + 2.5 | 86% | 78% |
| 40% | 36% | + 3.5 | 64% | 59% |
| 33% | 36% | + 4.5 | 36% | 37% |
| 18% | 7% | + 5.5 | 21% | 22% |
| 11% | 0% | + 6.5 | 21% | 22% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93% | 93% | + 0.5 | 100% | 96% |
| 90% | 86% | + 1.5 | 79% | 86% |
| 75% | 71% | + 2.5 | 71% | 78% |
| 61% | 57% | + 3.5 | 50% | 64% |
| 47% | 43% | + 4.5 | 43% | 45% |
| 43% | 36% | + 5.5 | 36% | 37% |
| 36% | 21% | + 6.5 | 36% | 26% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22% | 14% | - 1.5 | 36% | 30% |
| 22% | 14% | - 2.5 | 29% | 26% |
| 14% | 14% | - 3.5 | 29% | 26% |
| 7% | 7% | - 4.5 | 21% | 15% |
| 4% | 7% | - 5.5 | 14% | 11% |
| 57% | 64% | + 1.5 | 64% | 59% |
| 64% | 71% | + 2.5 | 71% | 70% |
| 68% | 79% | + 3.5 | 71% | 70% |
| 75% | 86% | + 4.5 | 79% | 86% |
| 4% | 93% | + 5.5 | 86% | 11% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RWD Molenbeek | 60 | 3-2 | 16-4 |
| 2. La Louvière | 59 | - | 7-2 |
| 3. Zulte Waregem | 56 | 5-5 | 7-3 |
| 4. Patro | 49 | 1-7 | 0-3 |
| 5. Beveren | 48 | 2-7 | 3-6 |
| 6. Club NXT U23 | 44 | 2-3 | 7-2 |
| 7. Lokeren-Temse | 39 | 5-6 | 2-7 |
| 8. K. Lierse S.K. | 37 | 5-1 | 8-7 |
| 9. Club Liège | 34 | 5-7 | 3-7 |
| 10. Lommel | 30 | - | - |
| 11. RFB | 28 | 3-4 | 4-4 |
| 12. Eupen | 27 | 6-0 | 8-2 |
| 13. RSCA Futures U23 | 26 | 3-2 | 4-2 |
| 14. RFC Seraing | 21 | 2-6 | 2-3 |
| 15. Deinze | 18 | 3-3 | - |
| 16. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 14 | 1-4 | 8-3 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Patro | 49 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| 2. La Louvière | 48 | - | 4-2 |
| 3. RWD Molenbeek | 46 | 1-1 | 6-3 |
| 4. Beveren | 46 | 0-5 | 1-3 |
| 5. Zulte Waregem | 45 | 3-3 | 2-3 |
| 6. Club Liège | 45 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| 7. K. Lierse S.K. | 44 | 2-0 | 3-3 |
| 8. Club NXT U23 | 37 | 1-1 | 5-1 |
| 9. Lokeren-Temse | 34 | 0-1 | 2-4 |
| 10. Lommel | 28 | - | - |
| 11. RSCA Futures U23 | 28 | 1-1 | 2-0 |
| 12. Eupen | 27 | 1-0 | 3-0 |
| 13. RFB | 27 | 0-1 | 4-1 |
| 14. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 26 | 0-2 | 1-3 |
| 15. RFC Seraing | 19 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| 16. Deinze | 15 | 2-0 | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. La Louvière | 50 | - | 3-0 |
| 2. RWD Molenbeek | 49 | 2-1 | 10-1 |
| 3. Patro | 47 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| 4. Zulte Waregem | 44 | 2-2 | 5-0 |
| 5. Club NXT U23 | 41 | 1-2 | 2-1 |
| 6. Lokeren-Temse | 36 | 5-5 | 0-3 |
| 7. RSCA Futures U23 | 35 | 2-1 | 2-2 |
| 8. Lommel | 34 | - | - |
| 9. Beveren | 33 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
| 10. RFB | 33 | 3-3 | 0-3 |
| 11. Eupen | 32 | 5-0 | 5-2 |
| 12. Club Liège | 30 | 4-3 | 2-4 |
| 13. RFC Seraing | 30 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| 14. K. Lierse S.K. | 29 | 3-1 | 5-4 |
| 15. Deinze | 19 | 1-3 | - |
| 16. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 18 | 1-2 | 7-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RWD Molenbeek | 60 | 3-4 | 7-3 |
| 2. La Louvière | 59 | 2-8 | 5-4 |
| 3. Zulte Waregem | 56 | 2-6 | 4-4 |
| 4. Patro | 49 | 3-2 | 10-2 |
| 5. Beveren | 48 | 2-4 | 3-8 |
| 6. Club NXT U23 | 44 | 5-9 | - |
| 7. Lokeren-Temse | 39 | 2-6 | 8-3 |
| 8. K. Lierse S.K. | 37 | 7-3 | 3-2 |
| 9. Club Liège | 34 | 7-0 | 14-3 |
| 10. Lommel | 30 | 4-4 | 3-4 |
| 11. RFB | 28 | - | - |
| 12. Eupen | 27 | 5-4 | 1-10 |
| 13. RSCA Futures U23 | 26 | - | 2-4 |
| 14. RFC Seraing | 21 | 4-6 | 7-5 |
| 15. Deinze | 18 | - | 1-8 |
| 16. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 14 | 9-5 | 1-5 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Patro | 49 | 0-0 | 4-0 |
| 2. La Louvière | 48 | 0-2 | 4-0 |
| 3. RWD Molenbeek | 46 | 1-4 | 2-1 |
| 4. Beveren | 46 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| 5. Zulte Waregem | 45 | 0-6 | 4-1 |
| 6. Club Liège | 45 | 5-0 | 3-1 |
| 7. K. Lierse S.K. | 44 | 1-3 | 2-1 |
| 8. Club NXT U23 | 37 | 4-3 | - |
| 9. Lokeren-Temse | 34 | 2-1 | 6-3 |
| 10. Lommel | 28 | 4-1 | 0-1 |
| 11. RSCA Futures U23 | 28 | - | 0-3 |
| 12. Eupen | 27 | 3-4 | 1-6 |
| 13. RFB | 27 | - | - |
| 14. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 26 | 6-2 | 0-4 |
| 15. RFC Seraing | 19 | 2-2 | 6-3 |
| 16. Deinze | 15 | - | 0-2 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. La Louvière | 50 | 2-6 | 1-4 |
| 2. RWD Molenbeek | 49 | 2-0 | 5-2 |
| 3. Patro | 47 | 3-2 | 6-2 |
| 4. Zulte Waregem | 44 | 2-0 | 0-3 |
| 5. Club NXT U23 | 41 | 1-6 | - |
| 6. Lokeren-Temse | 36 | 0-5 | 2-0 |
| 7. RSCA Futures U23 | 35 | - | 2-1 |
| 8. Lommel | 34 | 0-3 | 3-3 |
| 9. Beveren | 33 | 1-1 | 2-6 |
| 10. RFB | 33 | - | - |
| 11. Eupen | 32 | 2-0 | 0-4 |
| 12. Club Liège | 30 | 2-0 | 11-2 |
| 13. RFC Seraing | 30 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| 14. K. Lierse S.K. | 29 | 6-0 | 1-1 |
| 15. Deinze | 19 | - | 1-6 |
| 16. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 18 | 3-3 | 1-1 |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Man City
Brighton
Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle
Man Utd
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham
Everton
Leicester
Crystal Palace
Ipswich
Wolves
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.