© 2024 stats'play. All rights reserved.
Lommel vs RWD Molenbeek
Lommel and RWD Molenbeek Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Lommel and RWD Molenbeek: Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Lommel and RWD Molenbeek, Lommel's overall team strength is rated at 116, while RWD Molenbeek's is 167. In home matches, Lommel's team strength drops to 100, whereas RWD Molenbeek displays a team strength of 169 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 47% | 50% | Corners Won | 56% | 58% |
| 35% | 25% | Corners Lost | 42% | 8% |
| 8.24 | 7.63 | Avg. Corners | 10.33 | 9.68 |
| 4.24 | 4.38 | Corners For | 5.33 | 5.37 |
| 3.96 | 3.25 | Corners Against | 5.00 | 4.35 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 100% | + 4.5 | 89% | 95% |
| 77% | 75% | + 5.5 | 78% | 84% |
| 58% | 38% | + 6.5 | 78% | 74% |
| 58% | 38% | + 7.5 | 67% | 64% |
| 53% | 38% | + 8.5 | 56% | 58% |
| 36% | 38% | + 9.5 | 44% | 52% |
| 24% | 25% | + 10.5 | 44% | 37% |
| 12% | 13% | + 11.5 | 44% | 32% |
| 6% | 0% | + 12.5 | 33% | 22% |
| 6% | 0% | + 13.5 | 33% | 22% |
| 6% | 0% | + 14.5 | 22% | 11% |
| 0% | 0% | + 15.5 | 22% | 11% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 1.5 | 100% | 95% |
| 89% | 100% | + 2.5 | 78% | 79% |
| 54% | 63% | + 3.5 | 67% | 69% |
| 48% | 63% | + 4.5 | 33% | 47% |
| 23% | 13% | + 5.5 | 33% | 32% |
| 11% | 0% | + 6.5 | 22% | 26% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89% | 88% | + 0.5 | 100% | 95% |
| 82% | 75% | + 1.5 | 89% | 90% |
| 64% | 50% | + 2.5 | 78% | 64% |
| 47% | 38% | + 3.5 | 56% | 48% |
| 41% | 38% | + 4.5 | 44% | 37% |
| 35% | 25% | + 5.5 | 33% | 32% |
| 29% | 13% | + 6.5 | 33% | 27% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29% | 25% | - 1.5 | 44% | 47% |
| 29% | 25% | - 2.5 | 33% | 37% |
| 18% | 25% | - 3.5 | 33% | 32% |
| 7% | 13% | - 4.5 | 11% | 21% |
| 7% | 13% | - 5.5 | 11% | 21% |
| 78% | 88% | + 1.5 | 78% | 74% |
| 84% | 100% | + 2.5 | 78% | 84% |
| 84% | 100% | + 3.5 | 78% | 84% |
| 84% | 100% | + 4.5 | 89% | 90% |
| 7% | 100% | + 5.5 | 89% | 21% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Zulte Waregem | 45 | 5-5 | - |
| 2. RWD Molenbeek | 40 | 3-2 | - |
| 3. La Louvière | 38 | - | 7-2 |
| 4. Patro | 34 | - | 0-3 |
| 5. Club NXT U23 | 28 | - | 7-2 |
| 6. Beveren | 25 | - | 3-6 |
| 7. Club Liège | 23 | 5-7 | 3-7 |
| 8. K. Lierse S.K. | 23 | 5-1 | 8-7 |
| 9. Lommel | 20 | - | - |
| 10. RFC Seraing | 19 | - | 2-3 |
| 11. RFB | 19 | - | 4-4 |
| 12. Deinze | 18 | 3-3 | - |
| 13. Lokeren-Temse | 17 | 5-6 | - |
| 14. RSCA Futures U23 | 15 | 3-2 | - |
| 15. Eupen | 15 | 6-0 | - |
| 16. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 12 | - | 8-3 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Patro | 39 | - | 0-2 |
| 2. Club Liège | 32 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| 3. Zulte Waregem | 32 | 3-3 | - |
| 4. RWD Molenbeek | 30 | 1-1 | - |
| 5. La Louvière | 30 | - | 4-2 |
| 6. Beveren | 28 | - | 1-3 |
| 7. K. Lierse S.K. | 26 | 2-0 | 3-3 |
| 8. Club NXT U23 | 24 | - | 5-1 |
| 9. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 20 | - | 1-3 |
| 10. RFB | 20 | - | 4-1 |
| 11. Lokeren-Temse | 19 | 0-1 | - |
| 12. Lommel | 18 | - | - |
| 13. RSCA Futures U23 | 16 | 1-1 | - |
| 14. Deinze | 15 | 2-0 | - |
| 15. Eupen | 15 | 1-0 | - |
| 16. RFC Seraing | 14 | - | 2-2 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Zulte Waregem | 35 | 2-2 | - |
| 2. RWD Molenbeek | 34 | 2-1 | - |
| 3. La Louvière | 33 | - | 3-0 |
| 4. Patro | 31 | - | 0-1 |
| 5. Club NXT U23 | 26 | - | 2-1 |
| 6. RFC Seraing | 25 | - | 0-1 |
| 7. Eupen | 24 | 5-0 | - |
| 8. RSCA Futures U23 | 21 | 2-1 | - |
| 9. Lommel | 21 | - | - |
| 10. RFB | 21 | - | 0-3 |
| 11. K. Lierse S.K. | 21 | 3-1 | 5-4 |
| 12. Deinze | 19 | 1-3 | - |
| 13. Lokeren-Temse | 17 | 5-5 | - |
| 14. Beveren | 16 | - | 2-3 |
| 15. Club Liège | 16 | 4-3 | 2-4 |
| 16. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 15 | - | 7-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Zulte Waregem | 45 | 5-7 | - |
| 2. RWD Molenbeek | 40 | - | - |
| 3. La Louvière | 38 | 1-9 | 2-6 |
| 4. Patro | 34 | 10-0 | - |
| 5. Club NXT U23 | 28 | 2-4 | - |
| 6. Beveren | 25 | 8-2 | - |
| 7. Club Liège | 23 | 5-6 | 4-12 |
| 8. K. Lierse S.K. | 23 | 3-2 | - |
| 9. Lommel | 20 | - | 3-2 |
| 10. RFC Seraing | 19 | - | 5-4 |
| 11. RFB | 19 | - | 3-4 |
| 12. Deinze | 18 | 11-3 | - |
| 13. Lokeren-Temse | 17 | - | 12-2 |
| 14. RSCA Futures U23 | 15 | - | 8-4 |
| 15. Eupen | 15 | 5-2 | 1-3 |
| 16. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 12 | 4-2 | 7-11 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Patro | 39 | 6-0 | - |
| 2. Club Liège | 32 | 4-4 | 1-7 |
| 3. Zulte Waregem | 32 | 2-5 | - |
| 4. RWD Molenbeek | 30 | - | - |
| 5. La Louvière | 30 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| 6. Beveren | 28 | 1-1 | - |
| 7. K. Lierse S.K. | 26 | 2-1 | - |
| 8. Club NXT U23 | 24 | 1-2 | - |
| 9. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 20 | 3-1 | 5-6 |
| 10. RFB | 20 | - | 1-4 |
| 11. Lokeren-Temse | 19 | - | 5-0 |
| 12. Lommel | 18 | - | 1-1 |
| 13. RSCA Futures U23 | 16 | - | 2-2 |
| 14. Deinze | 15 | 8-2 | - |
| 15. Eupen | 15 | 2-2 | 1-2 |
| 16. RFC Seraing | 14 | - | 1-1 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Zulte Waregem | 35 | 3-2 | - |
| 2. RWD Molenbeek | 34 | - | - |
| 3. La Louvière | 33 | 0-6 | 1-3 |
| 4. Patro | 31 | 4-0 | - |
| 5. Club NXT U23 | 26 | 1-2 | - |
| 6. RFC Seraing | 25 | - | 4-3 |
| 7. Eupen | 24 | 3-0 | 0-1 |
| 8. RSCA Futures U23 | 21 | - | 6-2 |
| 9. Lommel | 21 | - | 2-1 |
| 10. RFB | 21 | - | 2-0 |
| 11. K. Lierse S.K. | 21 | 1-1 | - |
| 12. Deinze | 19 | 3-1 | - |
| 13. Lokeren-Temse | 17 | - | 7-2 |
| 14. Beveren | 16 | 7-1 | - |
| 15. Club Liège | 16 | 1-2 | 3-5 |
| 16. Jong KRC Genk U23 | 15 | 1-1 | 2-5 |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Man City
Brighton
Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle
Man Utd
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham
Everton
Leicester
Crystal Palace
Ipswich
Wolves
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.
Trending