Palestino vs Universidad de Chile
Palestino and Universidad de Chile Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Palestino and Universidad de Chile: Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Palestino and Universidad de Chile, Palestino's overall team strength is rated at 141, while Universidad de Chile's is 121. In home matches, Palestino's team strength drops to 146, whereas Universidad de Chile displays a team strength of 71 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 42% | 50% | Corners Won | 100% | 84% |
| 46% | 25% | Corners Lost | 0% | 0% |
| 8.86 | 8.50 | Avg. Corners | 9.00 | 10.50 |
| 4.29 | 4.25 | Corners For | 6.67 | 7.50 |
| 4.63 | 4.25 | Corners Against | 2.33 | 3.00 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84% | 100% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 71% | 75% | + 5.5 | 100% | 84% |
| 71% | 75% | + 6.5 | 67% | 67% |
| 59% | 50% | + 7.5 | 67% | 67% |
| 46% | 25% | + 8.5 | 33% | 50% |
| 46% | 25% | + 9.5 | 33% | 50% |
| 46% | 25% | + 10.5 | 33% | 50% |
| 29% | 25% | + 11.5 | 33% | 50% |
| 29% | 25% | + 12.5 | 33% | 50% |
| 13% | 25% | + 13.5 | 0% | 34% |
| 0% | 0% | + 14.5 | 0% | 17% |
| 0% | 0% | + 15.5 | 0% | 17% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 84% | 100% | + 1.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 71% | 75% | + 2.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 59% | 50% | + 3.5 | 100% | 84% |
| 59% | 50% | + 4.5 | 67% | 67% |
| 46% | 25% | + 5.5 | 33% | 50% |
| 13% | 25% | + 6.5 | 33% | 50% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | + 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 1.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 88% | 75% | + 2.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 59% | 50% | + 3.5 | 0% | 17% |
| 59% | 50% | + 4.5 | 0% | 17% |
| 29% | 25% | + 5.5 | 0% | 17% |
| 29% | 25% | + 6.5 | 0% | 17% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13% | 25% | - 1.5 | 100% | 67% |
| 0% | 0% | - 2.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 0% | 0% | - 3.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 0% | 0% | - 4.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 0% | 0% | - 5.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 71% | 75% | + 1.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 88% | 75% | + 2.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 3.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 0% | 100% | + 5.5 | 100% | 33% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Palestino | 16 | - | - |
| 2. Coquimbo Unido | 15 | - | - |
| 3. Huachipato | 14 | - | - |
| 4. Audax Italiano | 13 | 3-2 | - |
| 5. Universidad Católica | 11 | - | - |
| 6. Universidad de Chile | 10 | - | - |
| 7. Unión La Calera | 10 | 7-7 | - |
| 8. O'Higgins | 10 | - | - |
| 9. La Serena | 10 | - | - |
| 10. Cobresal | 9 | 2-5 | - |
| 11. Colo-Colo | 7 | - | 5-6 |
| 12. Unión Española | 6 | - | 7-6 |
| 13. Ñublense | 6 | 5-3 | - |
| 14. Everton | 5 | - | - |
| 15. Deportes Limache | 5 | - | - |
| 16. Iquique | 1 | - | 3-1 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Palestino | 14 | - | - |
| 2. Universidad Católica | 12 | - | - |
| 3. Universidad de Chile | 11 | - | - |
| 4. Coquimbo Unido | 11 | - | - |
| 5. Deportes Limache | 9 | - | - |
| 6. Cobresal | 9 | 1-2 | - |
| 7. Audax Italiano | 9 | 2-2 | - |
| 8. Ñublense | 9 | 3-3 | - |
| 9. Unión La Calera | 8 | 5-5 | - |
| 10. Colo-Colo | 8 | - | 1-2 |
| 11. Everton | 8 | - | - |
| 12. Huachipato | 8 | - | - |
| 13. O'Higgins | 7 | - | - |
| 14. La Serena | 7 | - | - |
| 15. Unión Española | 7 | - | 2-4 |
| 16. Iquique | 1 | - | 2-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Palestino | 15 | - | - |
| 2. Huachipato | 14 | - | - |
| 3. Coquimbo Unido | 13 | - | - |
| 4. Audax Italiano | 12 | 1-0 | - |
| 5. Unión La Calera | 11 | 2-2 | - |
| 6. O'Higgins | 11 | - | - |
| 7. La Serena | 10 | - | - |
| 8. Colo-Colo | 9 | - | 4-4 |
| 9. Cobresal | 9 | 1-3 | - |
| 10. Deportes Limache | 8 | - | - |
| 11. Universidad Católica | 7 | - | - |
| 12. Unión Española | 7 | - | 5-2 |
| 13. Universidad de Chile | 5 | - | - |
| 14. Everton | 5 | - | - |
| 15. Iquique | 5 | - | 1-1 |
| 16. Ñublense | 3 | 2-0 | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Palestino | 16 | - | - |
| 2. Coquimbo Unido | 15 | - | - |
| 3. Huachipato | 14 | - | - |
| 4. Audax Italiano | 13 | - | 2-4 |
| 5. Universidad Católica | 11 | - | - |
| 6. Universidad de Chile | 10 | - | - |
| 7. Unión La Calera | 10 | 7-7 | - |
| 8. O'Higgins | 10 | - | - |
| 9. La Serena | 10 | 3-2 | - |
| 10. Cobresal | 9 | - | 2-11 |
| 11. Colo-Colo | 7 | - | - |
| 12. Unión Española | 6 | - | - |
| 13. Ñublense | 6 | 15-2 | - |
| 14. Everton | 5 | - | 3-5 |
| 15. Deportes Limache | 5 | - | - |
| 16. Iquique | 1 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Palestino | 14 | - | - |
| 2. Universidad Católica | 12 | - | - |
| 3. Universidad de Chile | 11 | - | - |
| 4. Coquimbo Unido | 11 | - | - |
| 5. Deportes Limache | 9 | - | - |
| 6. Cobresal | 9 | - | 0-3 |
| 7. Audax Italiano | 9 | - | 2-2 |
| 8. Ñublense | 9 | 7-1 | - |
| 9. Unión La Calera | 8 | 3-5 | - |
| 10. Colo-Colo | 8 | - | - |
| 11. Everton | 8 | - | 2-0 |
| 12. Huachipato | 8 | - | - |
| 13. O'Higgins | 7 | - | - |
| 14. La Serena | 7 | 1-1 | - |
| 15. Unión Española | 7 | - | - |
| 16. Iquique | 1 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Palestino | 15 | - | - |
| 2. Huachipato | 14 | - | - |
| 3. Coquimbo Unido | 13 | - | - |
| 4. Audax Italiano | 12 | - | 0-2 |
| 5. Unión La Calera | 11 | 4-2 | - |
| 6. O'Higgins | 11 | - | - |
| 7. La Serena | 10 | 2-1 | - |
| 8. Colo-Colo | 9 | - | - |
| 9. Cobresal | 9 | - | 2-8 |
| 10. Deportes Limache | 8 | - | - |
| 11. Universidad Católica | 7 | - | - |
| 12. Unión Española | 7 | - | - |
| 13. Universidad de Chile | 5 | - | - |
| 14. Everton | 5 | - | 1-5 |
| 15. Iquique | 5 | - | - |
| 16. Ñublense | 3 | 8-1 | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Man City
Brighton
Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle
Man Utd
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham
Everton
Leicester
Crystal Palace
Ipswich
Wolves
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.