PK-35 vs EIF
PK-35 and EIF Comparison: Goals Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between PK-35 and EIF : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of PK-35 and EIF , PK-35 's overall team strength is rated at 138, while EIF 's is 200. In home matches, PK-35 's team strength drops to 75, whereas EIF displays a team strength of 150 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.00 | 1.50 | AVG goals | 3.00 | 5.00 |
| 75% | 50% | Goals Scored | 100% | 100% |
| 75% | 50% | Goals Conceded | 100% | 100% |
| 75% | 50% | Both teams to score | 100% | 100% |
| 75% | 50% | Over 2.5 Goals | 100% | 100% |
| 25% | 50% | Clean Sheet | 0% | 0% |
| 25% | 50% | Failed To Score | 0% | 0% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.33 | 1.50 | 1st Half AVG goals | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| 75% | 50% | 1st Half Goals Scored | 100% | 100% |
| 25% | 50% | 1st Half Goals Conceded | 100% | 100% |
| 25% | 50% | 1st Half Both teams to score | 100% | 100% |
| 25% | 50% | 1st Half Over 1.5 Goals | 100% | 100% |
| 75% | 50% | 1st Half Clean Sheet | 0% | 0% |
| 25% | 50% | 1st Half Failed To Score | 0% | 0% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. EIF | 9 | 1-2 | - |
| 2. TPS | 9 | - | - |
| 3. Lahti | 7 | 0-0 | - |
| 4. JIPPO Joensuu | 4 | - | - |
| 5. PK-35 | 4 | - | - |
| 6. HJK Klubi 04 | 3 | - | - |
| 7. JaPS | 3 | - | - |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 3 | - | - |
| 9. KaPa | 1 | - | - |
| 10. SalPa | 0 | - | 1-2 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 9 | - | - |
| 2. EIF | 7 | 1-2 | - |
| 3. Lahti | 5 | 0-0 | - |
| 4. HJK Klubi 04 | 4 | - | - |
| 5. KaPa | 4 | - | - |
| 6. PK-35 | 4 | - | - |
| 7. SJK Akatemia | 4 | - | - |
| 8. JIPPO Joensuu | 3 | - | - |
| 9. SalPa | 1 | - | 0-1 |
| 10. JaPS | 0 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. JIPPO Joensuu | 7 | - | - |
| 2. EIF | 5 | 0-0 | - |
| 3. Lahti | 5 | 0-0 | - |
| 4. TPS | 5 | - | - |
| 5. HJK Klubi 04 | 4 | - | - |
| 6. JaPS | 4 | - | - |
| 7. SJK Akatemia | 4 | - | - |
| 8. PK-35 | 3 | - | - |
| 9. SalPa | 1 | - | 1-1 |
| 10. KaPa | 0 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. EIF | 9 | - | - |
| 2. TPS | 9 | - | - |
| 3. Lahti | 7 | - | - |
| 4. JIPPO Joensuu | 4 | - | - |
| 5. PK-35 | 4 | - | 1-2 |
| 6. HJK Klubi 04 | 3 | - | - |
| 7. JaPS | 3 | 4-2 | - |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 3 | - | - |
| 9. KaPa | 1 | 4-2 | - |
| 10. SalPa | 0 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 9 | - | - |
| 2. EIF | 7 | - | - |
| 3. Lahti | 5 | - | - |
| 4. HJK Klubi 04 | 4 | - | - |
| 5. KaPa | 4 | 1-1 | - |
| 6. PK-35 | 4 | - | 1-2 |
| 7. SJK Akatemia | 4 | - | - |
| 8. JIPPO Joensuu | 3 | - | - |
| 9. SalPa | 1 | - | - |
| 10. JaPS | 0 | 3-1 | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. JIPPO Joensuu | 7 | - | - |
| 2. EIF | 5 | - | - |
| 3. Lahti | 5 | - | - |
| 4. TPS | 5 | - | - |
| 5. HJK Klubi 04 | 4 | - | - |
| 6. JaPS | 4 | 1-1 | - |
| 7. SJK Akatemia | 4 | - | - |
| 8. PK-35 | 3 | - | 0-0 |
| 9. SalPa | 1 | - | - |
| 10. KaPa | 0 | 3-1 | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.