RFS vs SK Super Nova
RFS and SK Super Nova Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between RFS and SK Super Nova : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of RFS and SK Super Nova , RFS 's overall team strength is rated at 162, while SK Super Nova 's is 113. In home matches, RFS 's team strength drops to 171, whereas SK Super Nova displays a team strength of 75 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 45% | 50% | Corners Won | 17% | 25% |
| 33% | 25% | Corners Lost | 33% | 3% |
| 8.00 | 9.00 | Avg. Corners | 6.00 | 6.22 |
| 4.78 | 5.75 | Corners For | 2.83 | 2.67 |
| 3.23 | 3.25 | Corners Against | 3.17 | 3.75 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68% | 75% | + 4.5 | 50% | 59% |
| 68% | 75% | + 5.5 | 50% | 59% |
| 68% | 75% | + 6.5 | 50% | 59% |
| 68% | 75% | + 7.5 | 33% | 50% |
| 68% | 75% | + 8.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 55% | 50% | + 9.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 23% | 25% | + 10.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 23% | 25% | + 11.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 13% | 25% | + 12.5 | 33% | 17% |
| 13% | 25% | + 13.5 | 33% | 17% |
| 13% | 25% | + 14.5 | 17% | 9% |
| 13% | 25% | + 15.5 | 0% | 0% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45% | 50% | - 1.5 | 17% | 25% |
| 35% | 50% | - 2.5 | 17% | 9% |
| 23% | 25% | - 3.5 | 17% | 9% |
| 23% | 25% | - 4.5 | 17% | 9% |
| 23% | 25% | - 5.5 | 17% | 9% |
| 68% | 75% | + 1.5 | 67% | 67% |
| 78% | 75% | + 2.5 | 67% | 67% |
| 78% | 75% | + 3.5 | 83% | 75% |
| 100% | 100% | + 4.5 | 83% | 75% |
| 23% | 100% | + 5.5 | 83% | 9% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RFS | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 19 | - | - |
| 3. Riga | 18 | - | - |
| 4. BFC Daugavpils | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 6. Liepāja | 11 | - | - |
| 7. METTA | 11 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 7 | - | - |
| 9. Tukums 2000 | 5 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 5 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. BFC Daugavpils | 19 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 17 | - | - |
| 3. Liepāja | 16 | - | - |
| 4. RFS | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Riga | 15 | - | - |
| 6. Tukums 2000 | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
| 9. METTA | 4 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Auda | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Riga | 18 | - | - |
| 3. BFC Daugavpils | 14 | - | - |
| 4. SK Super Nova | 14 | - | - |
| 5. METTA | 13 | - | - |
| 6. RFS | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 10 | - | - |
| 8. Liepāja | 8 | - | - |
| 9. Grobiņas | 8 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RFS | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 19 | - | - |
| 3. Riga | 18 | - | - |
| 4. BFC Daugavpils | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 6. Liepāja | 11 | - | - |
| 7. METTA | 11 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 7 | - | - |
| 9. Tukums 2000 | 5 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 5 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. BFC Daugavpils | 19 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 17 | - | - |
| 3. Liepāja | 16 | - | - |
| 4. RFS | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Riga | 15 | - | - |
| 6. Tukums 2000 | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
| 9. METTA | 4 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Auda | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Riga | 18 | - | - |
| 3. BFC Daugavpils | 14 | - | - |
| 4. SK Super Nova | 14 | - | - |
| 5. METTA | 13 | - | - |
| 6. RFS | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 10 | - | - |
| 8. Liepāja | 8 | - | - |
| 9. Grobiņas | 8 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 3 | - | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.