SK Super Nova vs RFS
SK Super Nova and RFS Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between SK Super Nova and RFS: Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of SK Super Nova and RFS, SK Super Nova's overall team strength is rated at 104, while RFS's is 175. In home matches, SK Super Nova's team strength drops to 150, whereas RFS displays a team strength of 150 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 17% | 33% | Corners Won | 40% | 54% |
| 37% | 33% | Corners Lost | 20% | 2% |
| 5.25 | 6.67 | Avg. Corners | 7.20 | 7.75 |
| 1.63 | 2.33 | Corners For | 4.00 | 5.00 |
| 3.77 | 4.33 | Corners Against | 3.20 | 2.60 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54% | 67% | + 4.5 | 60% | 64% |
| 54% | 67% | + 5.5 | 60% | 64% |
| 54% | 67% | + 6.5 | 60% | 64% |
| 44% | 67% | + 7.5 | 60% | 64% |
| 27% | 33% | + 8.5 | 60% | 64% |
| 27% | 33% | + 9.5 | 60% | 47% |
| 27% | 33% | + 10.5 | 20% | 27% |
| 27% | 33% | + 11.5 | 20% | 27% |
| 10% | 0% | + 12.5 | 0% | 17% |
| 10% | 0% | + 13.5 | 0% | 17% |
| 10% | 0% | + 14.5 | 0% | 17% |
| 0% | 0% | + 15.5 | 0% | 17% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17% | 33% | - 1.5 | 40% | 54% |
| 0% | 0% | - 2.5 | 20% | 44% |
| 0% | 0% | - 3.5 | 20% | 27% |
| 0% | 0% | - 4.5 | 20% | 27% |
| 0% | 0% | - 5.5 | 20% | 27% |
| 64% | 67% | + 1.5 | 60% | 80% |
| 64% | 67% | + 2.5 | 80% | 90% |
| 74% | 67% | + 3.5 | 80% | 90% |
| 74% | 67% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 0% | 67% | + 5.5 | 100% | 27% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RFS | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 16 | - | - |
| 3. Riga | 15 | - | - |
| 4. BFC Daugavpils | 13 | - | - |
| 5. METTA | 11 | - | - |
| 6. Liepāja | 10 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 9 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
| 9. Tukums 2000 | 5 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 5 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. BFC Daugavpils | 16 | - | - |
| 2. RFS | 15 | - | - |
| 3. Auda | 14 | - | - |
| 4. Riga | 14 | - | - |
| 5. Liepāja | 13 | - | - |
| 6. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 7. Tukums 2000 | 10 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
| 9. METTA | 4 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Auda | 18 | - | - |
| 2. Riga | 15 | - | - |
| 3. BFC Daugavpils | 13 | - | - |
| 4. RFS | 13 | - | - |
| 5. METTA | 12 | - | - |
| 6. SK Super Nova | 11 | - | - |
| 7. Liepāja | 8 | - | - |
| 8. Grobiņas | 8 | - | - |
| 9. Jelgava | 7 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RFS | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 16 | - | - |
| 3. Riga | 15 | - | - |
| 4. BFC Daugavpils | 13 | - | - |
| 5. METTA | 11 | - | - |
| 6. Liepāja | 10 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 9 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
| 9. Tukums 2000 | 5 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 5 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. BFC Daugavpils | 16 | - | - |
| 2. RFS | 15 | - | - |
| 3. Auda | 14 | - | - |
| 4. Riga | 14 | - | - |
| 5. Liepāja | 13 | - | - |
| 6. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 7. Tukums 2000 | 10 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
| 9. METTA | 4 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Auda | 18 | - | - |
| 2. Riga | 15 | - | - |
| 3. BFC Daugavpils | 13 | - | - |
| 4. RFS | 13 | - | - |
| 5. METTA | 12 | - | - |
| 6. SK Super Nova | 11 | - | - |
| 7. Liepāja | 8 | - | - |
| 8. Grobiņas | 8 | - | - |
| 9. Jelgava | 7 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 3 | - | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Man City
Brighton
Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle
Man Utd
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham
Everton
Leicester
Crystal Palace
Ipswich
Wolves
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.