EIF v TPS
EIF and TPS Comparison: Goals Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between EIF and TPS : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of EIF and TPS , EIF 's overall team strength is rated at 162, while TPS 's is 202. In home matches, EIF 's team strength drops to 210, whereas TPS displays a team strength of 240 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.50 | 5.25 | AVG goals | 5.00 | 4.38 |
| 88% | 100% | Goals Scored | 100% | 100% |
| 75% | 100% | Goals Conceded | 75% | 75% |
| 63% | 100% | Both teams to score | 75% | 75% |
| 50% | 75% | Over 2.5 Goals | 100% | 88% |
| 25% | 0% | Clean Sheet | 25% | 25% |
| 13% | 0% | Failed To Score | 0% | 0% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 19 | - | 2-0 |
| 2. Lahti | 17 | - | - |
| 3. EIF | 16 | - | - |
| 4. HJK Klubi 04 | 16 | 3-4 | - |
| 5. PK-35 | 13 | - | 1-2 |
| 6. JIPPO Joensuu | 10 | 1-1 | - |
| 7. JaPS | 6 | 4-2 | - |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 6 | - | 0-1 |
| 9. KaPa | 4 | 4-2 | - |
| 10. SalPa | 2 | - | 0-1 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 18 | - | 0-0 |
| 2. PK-35 | 15 | - | 1-2 |
| 3. Lahti | 14 | - | - |
| 4. HJK Klubi 04 | 14 | 1-2 | - |
| 5. JIPPO Joensuu | 11 | 0-1 | - |
| 6. EIF | 10 | - | - |
| 7. SJK Akatemia | 10 | - | 0-0 |
| 8. SalPa | 7 | - | 0-0 |
| 9. KaPa | 5 | 1-1 | - |
| 10. JaPS | 2 | 3-1 | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. EIF | 15 | - | - |
| 2. Lahti | 15 | - | - |
| 3. HJK Klubi 04 | 15 | 2-2 | - |
| 4. JIPPO Joensuu | 12 | 1-0 | - |
| 5. TPS | 12 | - | 2-0 |
| 6. JaPS | 10 | 1-1 | - |
| 7. PK-35 | 9 | - | 0-0 |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 7 | - | 0-1 |
| 9. KaPa | 4 | 3-1 | - |
| 10. SalPa | 4 | - | 0-1 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 19 | - | - |
| 2. Lahti | 17 | 2-2 | - |
| 3. EIF | 16 | 2-0 | - |
| 4. HJK Klubi 04 | 16 | - | 3-1 |
| 5. PK-35 | 13 | - | - |
| 6. JIPPO Joensuu | 10 | 2-1 | - |
| 7. JaPS | 6 | - | 0-6 |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 6 | - | 3-4 |
| 9. KaPa | 4 | 4-2 | - |
| 10. SalPa | 2 | - | 1-2 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 18 | - | - |
| 2. PK-35 | 15 | - | - |
| 3. Lahti | 14 | 1-0 | - |
| 4. HJK Klubi 04 | 14 | - | 1-1 |
| 5. JIPPO Joensuu | 11 | 1-0 | - |
| 6. EIF | 10 | 0-0 | - |
| 7. SJK Akatemia | 10 | - | 2-3 |
| 8. SalPa | 7 | - | 0-1 |
| 9. KaPa | 5 | 2-2 | - |
| 10. JaPS | 2 | - | 0-5 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. EIF | 15 | 2-0 | - |
| 2. Lahti | 15 | 1-2 | - |
| 3. HJK Klubi 04 | 15 | - | 2-0 |
| 4. JIPPO Joensuu | 12 | 1-1 | - |
| 5. TPS | 12 | - | - |
| 6. JaPS | 10 | - | 0-1 |
| 7. PK-35 | 9 | - | - |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 7 | - | 1-1 |
| 9. KaPa | 4 | 2-0 | - |
| 10. SalPa | 4 | - | 1-1 |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.