Lahti v EIF
Lahti and EIF Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Lahti and EIF : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Lahti and EIF , Lahti 's overall team strength is rated at 168, while EIF 's is 152. In home matches, Lahti 's team strength drops to 183, whereas EIF displays a team strength of 128 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 11% | 0% | Corners Won | 11% | 17% |
| 11% | 11% | Corners Lost | 17% | 3% |
| 3.72 | 2.11 | Avg. Corners | 2.44 | 2.50 |
| 2.11 | 0.89 | Corners For | 1.00 | 1.28 |
| 1.61 | 1.22 | Corners Against | 1.44 | 1.22 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33% | 22% | + 4.5 | 33% | 33% |
| 33% | 22% | + 5.5 | 22% | 28% |
| 33% | 22% | + 6.5 | 22% | 22% |
| 28% | 22% | + 7.5 | 22% | 17% |
| 22% | 11% | + 8.5 | 11% | 11% |
| 22% | 11% | + 9.5 | 0% | 6% |
| 22% | 11% | + 10.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 11% | 0% | + 11.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 6% | 0% | + 12.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 6% | 0% | + 13.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 6% | 0% | + 14.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 6% | 0% | + 15.5 | 0% | 0% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11% | 0% | - 1.5 | 0% | 11% |
| 11% | 0% | - 2.5 | 0% | 6% |
| 11% | 0% | - 3.5 | 0% | 6% |
| 11% | 0% | - 4.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 11% | 0% | - 5.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 89% | 89% | + 1.5 | 78% | 89% |
| 89% | 89% | + 2.5 | 89% | 95% |
| 100% | 100% | + 3.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 11% | 100% | + 5.5 | 100% | 0% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 41 | 0-0 | 6-12 |
| 2. Lahti | 40 | - | - |
| 3. EIF | 30 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 4. PK-35 | 25 | 0-0 | 6-6 |
| 5. HJK Klubi 04 | 23 | 0-0 | 5-2 |
| 6. JIPPO Joensuu | 20 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| 7. JaPS | 18 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 18 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. KaPa | 11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 10. SalPa | 6 | 4-4 | 1-10 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 37 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2. EIF | 31 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3. Lahti | 29 | - | - |
| 4. JIPPO Joensuu | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 5. PK-35 | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6. SJK Akatemia | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 7. HJK Klubi 04 | 19 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 8. KaPa | 17 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. SalPa | 11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 10. JaPS | 9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Lahti | 33 | - | - |
| 2. HJK Klubi 04 | 27 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3. TPS | 27 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 4. EIF | 26 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 5. JaPS | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6. PK-35 | 23 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 7. JIPPO Joensuu | 22 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 20 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. SalPa | 12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 10. KaPa | 10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 41 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2. Lahti | 40 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3. EIF | 30 | - | - |
| 4. PK-35 | 25 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
| 5. HJK Klubi 04 | 23 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 6. JIPPO Joensuu | 20 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 7. JaPS | 18 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 18 | 0-0 | 4-5 |
| 9. KaPa | 11 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 10. SalPa | 6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 37 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2. EIF | 31 | - | - |
| 3. Lahti | 29 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 4. JIPPO Joensuu | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 5. PK-35 | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6. SJK Akatemia | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 7. HJK Klubi 04 | 19 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 8. KaPa | 17 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. SalPa | 11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 10. JaPS | 9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Lahti | 33 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2. HJK Klubi 04 | 27 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3. TPS | 27 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 4. EIF | 26 | - | - |
| 5. JaPS | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6. PK-35 | 23 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 7. JIPPO Joensuu | 22 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 20 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. SalPa | 12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 10. KaPa | 10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.