Tukums 2000 v RFS
Tukums 2000 and RFS Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between Tukums 2000 and RFS : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of Tukums 2000 and RFS , Tukums 2000 's overall team strength is rated at 91, while RFS 's is 200. In home matches, Tukums 2000 's team strength drops to 140, whereas RFS displays a team strength of 185 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 11% | 0% | Corners Won | 50% | 50% |
| 64% | 71% | Corners Lost | 32% | 5% |
| 8.06 | 6.86 | Avg. Corners | 7.88 | 8.63 |
| 3.25 | 2.71 | Corners For | 4.88 | 5.19 |
| 4.74 | 4.14 | Corners Against | 3.00 | 3.44 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% | 71% | + 4.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 75% | 71% | + 5.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 75% | 71% | + 6.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 68% | 57% | + 7.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 61% | 43% | + 8.5 | 63% | 69% |
| 37% | 29% | + 9.5 | 50% | 57% |
| 29% | 14% | + 10.5 | 13% | 32% |
| 17% | 0% | + 11.5 | 13% | 26% |
| 11% | 0% | + 12.5 | 0% | 19% |
| 11% | 0% | + 13.5 | 0% | 13% |
| 6% | 0% | + 14.5 | 0% | 13% |
| 6% | 0% | + 15.5 | 0% | 7% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6% | 0% | - 1.5 | 50% | 50% |
| 0% | 0% | - 2.5 | 38% | 44% |
| 0% | 0% | - 3.5 | 38% | 38% |
| 0% | 0% | - 4.5 | 25% | 32% |
| 0% | 0% | - 5.5 | 25% | 19% |
| 65% | 86% | + 1.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 65% | 86% | + 2.5 | 88% | 82% |
| 82% | 86% | + 3.5 | 88% | 82% |
| 88% | 86% | + 4.5 | 100% | 94% |
| 0% | 86% | + 5.5 | 100% | 19% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 39 | - | - |
| 2. RFS | 34 | - | - |
| 3. Auda | 25 | - | - |
| 4. FK Liepaja | 22 | - | - |
| 5. BFC Daugavpils | 21 | - | - |
| 6. Jelgava | 20 | - | - |
| 7. Grobinas | 16 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 14 | - | - |
| 9. FK Metta | 12 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 11 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 32 | - | - |
| 2. RFS | 30 | - | - |
| 3. BFC Daugavpils | 25 | - | - |
| 4. Auda | 22 | - | - |
| 5. FK Liepaja | 22 | - | - |
| 6. Jelgava | 22 | - | - |
| 7. Tukums 2000 | 21 | - | - |
| 8. Grobinas | 16 | - | - |
| 9. SK Super Nova | 11 | - | - |
| 10. FK Metta | 7 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 36 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 32 | - | - |
| 3. SK Super Nova | 24 | - | - |
| 4. RFS | 22 | - | - |
| 5. BFC Daugavpils | 19 | - | - |
| 6. FK Liepaja | 19 | - | - |
| 7. Grobinas | 18 | - | - |
| 8. FK Metta | 17 | - | - |
| 9. Jelgava | 17 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 8 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 39 | - | - |
| 2. RFS | 37 | - | - |
| 3. Auda | 25 | - | - |
| 4. FK Liepaja | 22 | - | - |
| 5. BFC Daugavpils | 21 | - | - |
| 6. Jelgava | 20 | - | - |
| 7. Grobinas | 16 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 14 | - | - |
| 9. FK Metta | 12 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 11 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RFS | 33 | - | - |
| 2. Riga | 32 | - | - |
| 3. BFC Daugavpils | 25 | - | - |
| 4. Auda | 22 | - | - |
| 5. FK Liepaja | 22 | - | - |
| 6. Jelgava | 22 | - | - |
| 7. Tukums 2000 | 21 | - | - |
| 8. Grobinas | 16 | - | - |
| 9. SK Super Nova | 11 | - | - |
| 10. FK Metta | 7 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 36 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 32 | - | - |
| 3. RFS | 25 | - | - |
| 4. SK Super Nova | 24 | - | - |
| 5. BFC Daugavpils | 19 | - | - |
| 6. FK Liepaja | 19 | - | - |
| 7. Grobinas | 18 | - | - |
| 8. FK Metta | 17 | - | - |
| 9. Jelgava | 17 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 8 | - | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.