RFS v Auda
RFS and Auda Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between RFS and Auda : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of RFS and Auda , RFS 's overall team strength is rated at 172, while Auda 's is 118. In home matches, RFS 's team strength drops to 175, whereas Auda displays a team strength of 83 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 46% | 58% | Corners Won | 50% | 50% |
| 25% | 17% | Corners Lost | 33% | 8% |
| 7.00 | 8.08 | Avg. Corners | 8.67 | 9.21 |
| 4.13 | 4.92 | Corners For | 4.58 | 5.25 |
| 2.88 | 3.17 | Corners Against | 4.08 | 3.96 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67% | 75% | + 4.5 | 75% | 75% |
| 63% | 67% | + 5.5 | 67% | 71% |
| 63% | 67% | + 6.5 | 58% | 67% |
| 58% | 58% | + 7.5 | 50% | 63% |
| 50% | 58% | + 8.5 | 50% | 59% |
| 42% | 50% | + 9.5 | 50% | 59% |
| 21% | 33% | + 10.5 | 42% | 50% |
| 17% | 25% | + 11.5 | 42% | 46% |
| 13% | 25% | + 12.5 | 42% | 38% |
| 9% | 17% | + 13.5 | 25% | 29% |
| 9% | 17% | + 14.5 | 17% | 17% |
| 4% | 8% | + 15.5 | 8% | 8% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38% | 42% | - 1.5 | 42% | 46% |
| 34% | 42% | - 2.5 | 42% | 42% |
| 29% | 33% | - 3.5 | 25% | 34% |
| 25% | 33% | - 4.5 | 17% | 25% |
| 17% | 17% | - 5.5 | 17% | 21% |
| 79% | 83% | + 1.5 | 75% | 71% |
| 83% | 83% | + 2.5 | 75% | 88% |
| 83% | 83% | + 3.5 | 75% | 88% |
| 92% | 92% | + 4.5 | 75% | 88% |
| 17% | 92% | + 5.5 | 83% | 21% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 61 | - | - |
| 2. RFS | 58 | - | - |
| 3. FK Liepaja | 38 | 3-2 | - |
| 4. Auda | 37 | 4-3 | - |
| 5. BFC Daugavpils | 33 | - | 0-0 |
| 6. Jelgava | 27 | - | 0-0 |
| 7. SK Super Nova | 22 | - | - |
| 8. Tukums 2000 | 21 | 8-2 | - |
| 9. Grobinas | 20 | - | - |
| 10. FK Metta | 17 | - | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 51 | - | - |
| 2. RFS | 49 | - | - |
| 3. FK Liepaja | 36 | 0-0 | - |
| 4. BFC Daugavpils | 35 | - | 0-0 |
| 5. Auda | 32 | 0-0 | - |
| 6. Tukums 2000 | 31 | 0-0 | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 29 | - | 0-0 |
| 8. Grobinas | 24 | - | - |
| 9. SK Super Nova | 21 | - | - |
| 10. FK Metta | 11 | - | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 51 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 45 | 0-0 | - |
| 3. RFS | 42 | - | - |
| 4. FK Liepaja | 32 | 0-0 | - |
| 5. SK Super Nova | 32 | - | - |
| 6. BFC Daugavpils | 31 | - | 0-0 |
| 7. FK Metta | 27 | - | 0-0 |
| 8. Grobinas | 24 | - | - |
| 9. Jelgava | 23 | - | 0-0 |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 16 | 0-0 | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 58 | 5-7 | - |
| 2. RFS | 55 | - | 4-3 |
| 3. FK Liepaja | 38 | - | 9-4 |
| 4. Auda | 37 | - | - |
| 5. BFC Daugavpils | 33 | 11-3 | - |
| 6. Jelgava | 27 | 5-7 | - |
| 7. SK Super Nova | 22 | - | 5-8 |
| 8. Tukums 2000 | 21 | - | - |
| 9. Grobinas | 20 | - | - |
| 10. FK Metta | 17 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 48 | 0-0 | - |
| 2. RFS | 46 | - | 0-0 |
| 3. FK Liepaja | 36 | - | 0-0 |
| 4. BFC Daugavpils | 35 | 0-0 | - |
| 5. Auda | 32 | - | - |
| 6. Tukums 2000 | 31 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 29 | 0-0 | - |
| 8. Grobinas | 24 | - | - |
| 9. SK Super Nova | 21 | - | 0-0 |
| 10. FK Metta | 11 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Riga | 51 | 0-0 | - |
| 2. Auda | 45 | - | - |
| 3. RFS | 41 | - | 0-0 |
| 4. FK Liepaja | 32 | - | 0-0 |
| 5. SK Super Nova | 32 | - | 0-0 |
| 6. BFC Daugavpils | 31 | 0-0 | - |
| 7. FK Metta | 24 | - | - |
| 8. Grobinas | 24 | - | - |
| 9. Jelgava | 23 | 0-0 | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 15 | - | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.