TPS v JaPS
TPS and JaPS Comparison: Corners Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between TPS and JaPS : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of TPS and JaPS , TPS 's overall team strength is rated at 240, while JaPS 's is 166. In home matches, TPS 's team strength drops to 256, whereas JaPS displays a team strength of 156 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All |
|---|
| 28% | 22% | Corners Won | 0% | 6% |
| 17% | 33% | Corners Lost | 22% | 4% |
| 5.28 | 6.44 | Avg. Corners | 3.11 | 3.33 |
| 2.83 | 3.11 | Corners For | 1.22 | 1.50 |
| 2.45 | 3.33 | Corners Against | 1.89 | 1.84 |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45% | 56% | + 4.5 | 33% | 28% |
| 45% | 56% | + 5.5 | 33% | 28% |
| 39% | 44% | + 6.5 | 22% | 22% |
| 39% | 44% | + 7.5 | 22% | 22% |
| 28% | 33% | + 8.5 | 22% | 22% |
| 22% | 22% | + 9.5 | 22% | 22% |
| 22% | 22% | + 10.5 | 11% | 17% |
| 22% | 22% | + 11.5 | 11% | 17% |
| 22% | 22% | + 12.5 | 0% | 11% |
| 17% | 22% | + 13.5 | 0% | 6% |
| 17% | 22% | + 14.5 | 0% | 6% |
| 17% | 22% | + 15.5 | 0% | 6% |
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28% | 22% | - 1.5 | 0% | 6% |
| 22% | 22% | - 2.5 | 0% | 6% |
| 17% | 22% | - 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 6% | 11% | - 4.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 0% | 0% | - 5.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 84% | 67% | + 1.5 | 67% | 78% |
| 89% | 78% | + 2.5 | 100% | 95% |
| 95% | 89% | + 3.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 95% | 89% | + 4.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 0% | 89% | + 5.5 | 100% | 0% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 41 | - | - |
| 2. Lahti | 40 | 6-12 | 0-0 |
| 3. EIF | 30 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 4. PK-35 | 28 | 7-10 | 0-0 |
| 5. HJK Klubi 04 | 26 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6. JIPPO Joensuu | 23 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 7. JaPS | 21 | 0-0 | 5-8 |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 18 | 7-2 | 6-10 |
| 9. KaPa | 11 | 0-0 | 3-5 |
| 10. SalPa | 6 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 40 | - | - |
| 2. EIF | 31 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3. Lahti | 29 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 4. JIPPO Joensuu | 27 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 5. PK-35 | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6. SJK Akatemia | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 7. HJK Klubi 04 | 22 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 8. KaPa | 17 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. JaPS | 12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 10. SalPa | 11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Lahti | 33 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2. HJK Klubi 04 | 30 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3. JaPS | 27 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 4. TPS | 27 | - | - |
| 5. EIF | 26 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6. PK-35 | 26 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 7. JIPPO Joensuu | 25 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 20 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. SalPa | 12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 10. KaPa | 10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 41 | 5-8 | 0-0 |
| 2. Lahti | 40 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3. EIF | 30 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 4. PK-35 | 25 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 5. HJK Klubi 04 | 23 | 0-0 | 7-5 |
| 6. JIPPO Joensuu | 23 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 7. JaPS | 21 | - | - |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 18 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. KaPa | 11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 10. SalPa | 6 | 11-8 | 6-4 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. TPS | 37 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2. EIF | 31 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3. Lahti | 29 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 4. JIPPO Joensuu | 27 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 5. PK-35 | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6. SJK Akatemia | 24 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 7. HJK Klubi 04 | 19 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 8. KaPa | 17 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. JaPS | 12 | - | - |
| 10. SalPa | 11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Lahti | 33 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2. HJK Klubi 04 | 27 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3. JaPS | 27 | - | - |
| 4. TPS | 27 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 5. EIF | 26 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6. JIPPO Joensuu | 25 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 7. PK-35 | 23 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 8. SJK Akatemia | 20 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9. SalPa | 12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 10. KaPa | 10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.