statsplay
0
Soccer
Filter Matrix
Head to Head
Leagues
Favourite
Profile
All Home Away
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ Avg. G▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ BTTS▼ GF▼ GA▼
1. Daegu FC 2.81 93% 75% 68% 37% 6% 0% 62% 62% 93%
2. FC Anyang 2.63 100% 81% 56% 25% 0% 0% 62% 81% 81%
3. Daejeon Hana Citizen 2.59 94% 82% 52% 23% 5% 0% 52% 76% 70%
4. Gimcheon Sangmu 2.5 87% 68% 43% 31% 18% 0% 43% 68% 62%
5. Pohang Steelers 2.38 93% 75% 43% 18% 6% 0% 50% 75% 68%
6. Jeju 2.19 87% 68% 37% 18% 6% 0% 43% 68% 62%
7. Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors 2.19 93% 62% 37% 25% 0% 0% 43% 81% 56%
8. Ulsan 2.18 94% 70% 29% 11% 11% 0% 47% 76% 64%
9. Suwon FC 2.06 81% 62% 37% 18% 6% 0% 50% 56% 75%
10. Gwangju 1.94 87% 50% 37% 12% 6% 0% 43% 62% 68%
11. Gangwon 1.88 87% 50% 37% 12% 0% 0% 31% 56% 62%
12. FC Seoul 1.63 75% 43% 25% 12% 6% 0% 37% 56% 56%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Daegu FC 16 81% 37% 6% 0% 1.25 18% 62% 0%
2. FC Anyang 16 62% 25% 6% 6% 1 43% 31% 12%
3. Daejeon Hana Citizen 17 58% 23% 11% 5% 1 47% 23% 11%
4. Gimcheon Sangmu 16 62% 31% 6% 6% 1.06 43% 37% 18%
5. Pohang Steelers 16 68% 25% 6% 0% 1 37% 50% 18%
6. Jeju 16 68% 6% 0% 0% 0.75 37% 31% 0%
7. Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors 16 56% 37% 6% 0% 1 50% 18% 12%
8. Ulsan 17 64% 17% 5% 5% 0.94 41% 41% 17%
9. Suwon FC 16 62% 12% 0% 0% 0.75 31% 43% 12%
10. Gwangju 16 68% 18% 0% 0% 0.88 43% 37% 12%
11. Gangwon 16 50% 18% 0% 0% 0.69 25% 31% 6%
12. FC Seoul 16 50% 6% 0% 0% 0.56 18% 31% 0%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Daegu FC 16 81% 50% 18% 6% 1.56 62% 56% 37%
2. FC Anyang 16 75% 62% 12% 0% 1.5 50% 56% 31%
3. Daejeon Hana Citizen 17 88% 41% 11% 5% 1.47 52% 52% 17%
4. Gimcheon Sangmu 16 68% 37% 25% 12% 1.44 50% 50% 31%
5. Pohang Steelers 16 81% 43% 12% 0% 1.38 56% 37% 12%
6. Jeju 16 75% 43% 12% 12% 1.44 50% 62% 37%
7. Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors 16 75% 37% 6% 0% 1.19 50% 43% 18%
8. Ulsan 17 88% 23% 5% 5% 1.24 58% 47% 17%
9. Suwon FC 16 68% 37% 25% 0% 1.31 37% 56% 25%
10. Gwangju 16 68% 31% 6% 0% 1.06 37% 50% 18%
11. Gangwon 16 75% 43% 0% 0% 1.19 43% 43% 12%
12. FC Seoul 16 56% 31% 12% 6% 1.06 43% 37% 25%
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Daegu FC 8 100% 62% 62% 37% 0% 0% 2.63 50% 100% 50%
2. FC Anyang 8 100% 87% 50% 37% 0% 0% 2.75 75% 87% 62%
3. Daejeon Hana Citizen 9 88% 66% 33% 11% 0% 0% 2 66% 66% 44%
4. Gimcheon Sangmu 7 85% 57% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.43 57% 42% 14%
5. Pohang Steelers 8 87% 50% 37% 0% 0% 0% 1.75 62% 50% 25%
6. Jeju 8 87% 75% 50% 25% 12% 0% 2.5 75% 50% 37%
7. Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors 8 100% 87% 50% 37% 0% 0% 2.75 87% 87% 75%
8. Ulsan 9 88% 66% 44% 22% 22% 0% 2.44 77% 55% 44%
9. Suwon FC 8 87% 75% 50% 12% 12% 0% 2.38 75% 75% 62%
10. Gwangju 9 88% 44% 33% 11% 11% 0% 1.89 66% 66% 44%
11. Gangwon 8 75% 50% 37% 25% 0% 0% 1.88 50% 62% 37%
12. FC Seoul 7 85% 71% 57% 28% 14% 0% 2.57 71% 85% 71%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Daegu FC 8 75% 37% 0% 0% 1.13 25% 50% 0%
2. FC Anyang 8 50% 25% 12% 12% 1 37% 37% 25%
3. Daejeon Hana Citizen 9 55% 11% 11% 0% 0.78 33% 33% 11%
4. Gimcheon Sangmu 7 42% 14% 0% 0% 0.57 28% 14% 0%
5. Pohang Steelers 8 50% 0% 0% 0% 0.5 25% 25% 0%
6. Jeju 8 75% 0% 0% 0% 0.75 50% 25% 0%
7. Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors 8 75% 62% 12% 0% 1.5 62% 37% 25%
8. Ulsan 9 66% 33% 11% 11% 1.22 55% 44% 33%
9. Suwon FC 8 62% 12% 0% 0% 0.75 50% 25% 12%
10. Gwangju 9 66% 22% 0% 0% 0.89 44% 33% 11%
11. Gangwon 8 62% 25% 0% 0% 0.88 12% 50% 0%
12. FC Seoul 7 71% 14% 0% 0% 0.86 28% 42% 0%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Daegu FC 8 87% 50% 12% 0% 1.5 50% 62% 25%
2. FC Anyang 8 87% 75% 12% 0% 1.75 62% 62% 37%
3. Daejeon Hana Citizen 9 77% 22% 0% 0% 1 44% 44% 11%
4. Gimcheon Sangmu 7 71% 14% 0% 0% 0.86 42% 42% 14%
5. Pohang Steelers 8 75% 37% 12% 0% 1.25 50% 37% 12%
6. Jeju 8 75% 50% 25% 25% 1.75 62% 50% 37%
7. Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors 8 87% 37% 0% 0% 1.25 50% 62% 25%
8. Ulsan 9 77% 22% 11% 11% 1.22 44% 44% 11%
9. Suwon FC 8 75% 50% 37% 0% 1.63 50% 62% 37%
10. Gwangju 9 66% 22% 11% 0% 1 33% 44% 11%
11. Gangwon 8 50% 50% 0% 0% 1 37% 37% 25%
12. FC Seoul 7 71% 57% 28% 14% 1.71 57% 57% 42%
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Daegu FC 8 87% 87% 75% 37% 12% 0% 3 75% 87% 75%
2. FC Anyang 8 100% 75% 62% 12% 0% 0% 2.5 87% 75% 62%
3. Daejeon Hana Citizen 8 100% 100% 75% 37% 12% 0% 3.25 87% 75% 62%
4. Gimcheon Sangmu 9 88% 77% 77% 55% 33% 0% 3.33 77% 77% 66%
5. Pohang Steelers 8 100% 100% 50% 37% 12% 0% 3 87% 87% 75%
6. Jeju 8 87% 62% 25% 12% 0% 0% 1.88 62% 75% 50%
7. Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors 8 87% 37% 25% 12% 0% 0% 1.63 75% 25% 12%
8. Ulsan 8 100% 75% 12% 0% 0% 0% 1.88 75% 75% 50%
9. Suwon FC 8 75% 50% 25% 25% 0% 0% 1.75 37% 75% 37%
10. Gwangju 7 85% 57% 42% 14% 0% 0% 2 57% 71% 42%
11. Gangwon 8 100% 50% 37% 0% 0% 0% 1.88 62% 62% 25%
12. FC Seoul 9 66% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.89 44% 33% 11%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Daegu FC 8 87% 37% 12% 0% 1.38 12% 75% 0%
2. FC Anyang 8 75% 25% 0% 0% 1 50% 25% 0%
3. Daejeon Hana Citizen 8 62% 37% 12% 12% 1.25 62% 12% 12%
4. Gimcheon Sangmu 9 77% 44% 11% 11% 1.44 55% 55% 33%
5. Pohang Steelers 8 87% 50% 12% 0% 1.5 50% 75% 37%
6. Jeju 8 62% 12% 0% 0% 0.75 25% 37% 0%
7. Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors 8 37% 12% 0% 0% 0.5 37% 0% 0%
8. Ulsan 8 62% 0% 0% 0% 0.63 25% 37% 0%
9. Suwon FC 8 62% 12% 0% 0% 0.75 12% 62% 12%
10. Gwangju 7 71% 14% 0% 0% 0.86 42% 42% 14%
11. Gangwon 8 37% 12% 0% 0% 0.5 37% 12% 12%
12. FC Seoul 9 33% 0% 0% 0% 0.33 11% 22% 0%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Daegu FC 8 75% 50% 25% 12% 1.63 75% 50% 50%
2. FC Anyang 8 62% 50% 12% 0% 1.25 37% 50% 25%
3. Daejeon Hana Citizen 8 100% 62% 25% 12% 2 62% 62% 25%
4. Gimcheon Sangmu 9 66% 55% 44% 22% 1.89 55% 55% 44%
5. Pohang Steelers 8 87% 50% 12% 0% 1.5 62% 37% 12%
6. Jeju 8 75% 37% 0% 0% 1.13 37% 75% 37%
7. Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors 8 62% 37% 12% 0% 1.13 50% 25% 12%
8. Ulsan 8 100% 25% 0% 0% 1.25 75% 50% 25%
9. Suwon FC 8 62% 25% 12% 0% 1 25% 50% 12%
10. Gwangju 7 71% 42% 0% 0% 1.14 42% 57% 28%
11. Gangwon 8 100% 37% 0% 0% 1.38 50% 50% 0%
12. FC Seoul 9 44% 11% 0% 0% 0.56 33% 22% 11%