stats'play
# Team Avg. G +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +3.5 +4.5 +5.5 BTTS GF GA
1. Karlsruhe 3.84 94% 89% 78% 57% 36% 15% 84% 94% 84%
2. Darmstadt 3.68 94% 89% 68% 52% 26% 26% 78% 78% 94%
3. Schalke 3.63 89% 84% 68% 57% 26% 21% 68% 73% 84%
4. HSV 3.58 100% 89% 73% 63% 26% 5% 73% 94% 78%
5. Nürnberg 3.58 94% 89% 68% 52% 21% 5% 68% 78% 84%
6. Kaiserslautern 3.47 89% 73% 73% 52% 26% 21% 63% 78% 73%
7. Fürth 3.47 94% 84% 68% 52% 26% 15% 63% 73% 84%
8. Magdeburg 3.32 89% 84% 73% 52% 10% 10% 73% 84% 78%
9. Hertha 3.26 94% 89% 68% 47% 15% 5% 73% 84% 84%
10. Elversberg 3.21 89% 73% 63% 52% 26% 10% 57% 78% 68%
11. Fortuna 3.16 94% 84% 57% 36% 21% 10% 52% 78% 68%
12. Paderborn 3 89% 84% 68% 31% 15% 10% 73% 84% 78%
13. Köln 3 100% 63% 57% 42% 15% 10% 52% 94% 57%
14. Regensburg 2.89 89% 63% 47% 26% 21% 15% 21% 31% 78%
15. Braunschweig 2.84 84% 78% 52% 42% 21% 5% 52% 63% 73%
16. Münster 2.53 84% 68% 52% 26% 15% 5% 63% 73% 73%
17. Ulm 2.37 78% 68% 47% 26% 10% 5% 63% 63% 78%
18. Hannover 2.32 89% 63% 47% 26% 5% 0% 42% 73% 57%
# Team P +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +3.5 Avg. G GF GA BTTS
1. Karlsruhe 19 89% 57% 26% 5% 1.89 73% 68% 52%
2. Darmstadt 19 78% 52% 26% 5% 1.63 63% 52% 36%
3. Schalke 19 78% 52% 36% 15% 1.84 52% 68% 42%
4. HSV 19 84% 47% 21% 0% 1.53 68% 31% 15%
5. Nürnberg 19 78% 47% 31% 10% 1.74 47% 68% 36%
6. Kaiserslautern 19 73% 42% 26% 5% 1.47 57% 52% 36%
7. Fürth 19 78% 63% 31% 5% 1.79 57% 68% 47%
8. Magdeburg 19 73% 52% 31% 0% 1.58 57% 52% 36%
9. Hertha 19 84% 36% 10% 0% 1.32 47% 68% 31%
10. Elversberg 19 68% 47% 0% 0% 1.16 47% 47% 26%
11. Fortuna 19 68% 31% 10% 0% 1.11 42% 47% 21%
12. Paderborn 19 63% 31% 10% 0% 1.05 47% 47% 31%
13. Köln 19 68% 36% 15% 5% 1.37 57% 26% 15%
14. Regensburg 19 78% 26% 10% 5% 1.26 21% 68% 10%
15. Braunschweig 19 73% 31% 15% 5% 1.26 42% 47% 15%
16. Münster 19 68% 42% 10% 0% 1.21 52% 52% 36%
17. Ulm 19 63% 31% 10% 0% 1.05 52% 31% 21%
18. Hannover 19 63% 26% 0% 0% 0.89 42% 31% 10%
# Team P +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +3.5 Avg. G GF GA BTTS
1. Karlsruhe 19 89% 63% 31% 10% 1.95 52% 63% 26%
2. Darmstadt 19 84% 63% 47% 10% 2.05 52% 63% 31%
3. Schalke 19 78% 57% 36% 5% 1.79 52% 52% 26%
4. HSV 19 100% 57% 31% 15% 2.05 63% 68% 31%
5. Nürnberg 19 89% 47% 31% 5% 1.84 63% 47% 21%
6. Kaiserslautern 19 78% 52% 42% 21% 2 68% 52% 42%
7. Fürth 19 89% 42% 26% 10% 1.68 52% 63% 26%
8. Magdeburg 19 84% 36% 31% 15% 1.74 57% 47% 21%
9. Hertha 19 89% 63% 26% 15% 1.95 68% 57% 36%
10. Elversberg 19 84% 63% 42% 10% 2.05 63% 52% 31%
11. Fortuna 19 89% 73% 26% 10% 2.05 73% 47% 31%
12. Paderborn 19 78% 73% 31% 10% 1.95 73% 57% 52%
13. Köln 19 84% 47% 31% 0% 1.63 63% 52% 31%
14. Regensburg 19 57% 52% 31% 10% 1.63 21% 57% 21%
15. Braunschweig 19 78% 47% 31% 0% 1.58 42% 52% 15%
16. Münster 19 73% 42% 10% 5% 1.32 42% 52% 21%
17. Ulm 19 57% 42% 26% 5% 1.32 36% 57% 36%
18. Hannover 19 73% 42% 21% 5% 1.42 52% 52% 31%
# Team P +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +3.5 +4.5 +5.5 Avg. G GF GA BTTS
1. Karlsruhe 9 100% 100% 77% 77% 55% 22% 4.33 100% 88% 88%
2. Darmstadt 10 90% 80% 40% 30% 20% 20% 2.8 70% 90% 70%
3. Schalke 9 100% 100% 77% 66% 33% 33% 4.44 88% 88% 77%
4. HSV 10 100% 90% 70% 70% 30% 0% 3.6 100% 70% 70%
5. Nürnberg 9 88% 77% 66% 55% 22% 11% 3.78 66% 77% 55%
6. Kaiserslautern 9 100% 88% 88% 66% 22% 11% 3.89 88% 88% 77%
7. Fürth 10 90% 80% 70% 50% 30% 20% 3.4 80% 80% 70%
8. Magdeburg 9 77% 77% 55% 44% 0% 0% 2.56 66% 77% 66%
9. Hertha 9 100% 88% 66% 44% 22% 0% 3.22 77% 88% 66%
10. Elversberg 10 100% 90% 90% 80% 30% 20% 4.2 100% 80% 80%
11. Fortuna 10 90% 80% 60% 50% 30% 20% 3.5 70% 70% 50%
12. Paderborn 9 77% 77% 77% 33% 22% 11% 3 77% 66% 66%
13. Köln 10 100% 80% 70% 40% 20% 10% 3.4 100% 60% 60%
14. Regensburg 10 90% 40% 40% 10% 0% 0% 1.8 30% 70% 10%
15. Braunschweig 9 77% 77% 44% 22% 0% 0% 2.22 66% 55% 44%
16. Münster 10 80% 50% 40% 10% 10% 10% 2 60% 70% 50%
17. Ulm 9 88% 77% 55% 22% 11% 11% 2.67 77% 88% 77%
18. Hannover 10 90% 70% 50% 30% 10% 0% 2.5 90% 50% 50%
# Team P +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +3.5 Avg. G GF GA BTTS
1. Karlsruhe 9 100% 77% 22% 0% 2 100% 66% 66%
2. Darmstadt 10 80% 50% 10% 0% 1.4 70% 50% 40%
3. Schalke 9 88% 66% 55% 33% 2.44 66% 77% 55%
4. HSV 10 80% 60% 40% 0% 1.8 80% 10% 10%
5. Nürnberg 9 77% 33% 22% 11% 1.56 44% 66% 33%
6. Kaiserslautern 9 100% 55% 55% 11% 2.22 88% 66% 55%
7. Fürth 10 70% 60% 20% 0% 1.5 50% 60% 40%
8. Magdeburg 9 55% 44% 33% 0% 1.33 44% 44% 33%
9. Hertha 9 88% 22% 0% 0% 1.11 22% 77% 11%
10. Elversberg 10 90% 70% 0% 0% 1.6 70% 60% 40%
11. Fortuna 10 60% 40% 20% 0% 1.2 50% 40% 30%
12. Paderborn 9 77% 44% 22% 0% 1.44 55% 66% 44%
13. Köln 10 60% 40% 20% 10% 1.5 40% 30% 10%
14. Regensburg 10 80% 0% 0% 0% 0.8 20% 60% 0%
15. Braunschweig 9 66% 11% 0% 0% 0.78 55% 22% 11%
16. Münster 10 50% 30% 0% 0% 0.8 50% 30% 30%
17. Ulm 9 55% 33% 11% 0% 1 55% 11% 11%
18. Hannover 10 60% 20% 0% 0% 0.8 40% 30% 10%
# Team P +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +3.5 Avg. G GF GA BTTS
1. Karlsruhe 9 100% 77% 44% 11% 2.33 55% 77% 33%
2. Darmstadt 10 70% 40% 20% 10% 1.4 30% 50% 10%
3. Schalke 9 88% 66% 33% 11% 2 55% 66% 33%
4. HSV 10 100% 50% 20% 10% 1.8 50% 70% 20%
5. Nürnberg 9 88% 55% 44% 11% 2.22 66% 44% 22%
6. Kaiserslautern 9 77% 44% 33% 11% 1.67 66% 44% 33%
7. Fürth 10 90% 50% 30% 20% 1.9 70% 60% 40%
8. Magdeburg 9 77% 22% 11% 11% 1.22 33% 66% 22%
9. Hertha 9 88% 77% 33% 11% 2.11 66% 66% 44%
10. Elversberg 10 100% 80% 50% 20% 2.6 70% 70% 40%
11. Fortuna 10 90% 80% 30% 20% 2.3 60% 70% 40%
12. Paderborn 9 66% 55% 33% 0% 1.56 66% 33% 33%
13. Köln 10 100% 50% 40% 0% 1.9 80% 50% 30%
14. Regensburg 10 40% 40% 20% 0% 1 10% 40% 10%
15. Braunschweig 9 66% 44% 33% 0% 1.44 44% 44% 22%
16. Münster 10 70% 20% 20% 10% 1.2 30% 60% 20%
17. Ulm 9 77% 55% 33% 0% 1.67 44% 77% 44%
18. Hannover 10 70% 60% 30% 10% 1.7 70% 40% 40%
# Team P +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +3.5 +4.5 +5.5 Avg. G GF GA BTTS
1. Karlsruhe 10 90% 80% 80% 40% 20% 10% 3.4 90% 80% 80%
2. Darmstadt 9 100% 100% 100% 77% 33% 33% 4.67 88% 100% 88%
3. Schalke 10 80% 70% 60% 50% 20% 10% 2.9 60% 80% 60%
4. HSV 9 100% 88% 77% 55% 22% 11% 3.56 88% 88% 77%
5. Nürnberg 10 100% 100% 70% 50% 20% 0% 3.4 90% 90% 80%
6. Kaiserslautern 10 80% 60% 60% 40% 30% 30% 3.1 70% 60% 50%
7. Fürth 9 100% 88% 66% 55% 22% 11% 3.56 66% 88% 55%
8. Magdeburg 10 100% 90% 90% 60% 20% 20% 4 100% 80% 80%
9. Hertha 10 90% 90% 70% 50% 10% 10% 3.3 90% 80% 80%
10. Elversberg 9 77% 55% 33% 22% 22% 0% 2.11 55% 55% 33%
11. Fortuna 9 100% 88% 55% 22% 11% 0% 2.78 88% 66% 55%
12. Paderborn 10 100% 90% 60% 30% 10% 10% 3 90% 90% 80%
13. Köln 9 100% 44% 44% 44% 11% 11% 2.56 88% 55% 44%
14. Regensburg 9 88% 88% 55% 44% 44% 33% 4.11 33% 88% 33%
15. Braunschweig 10 90% 80% 60% 60% 40% 10% 3.4 60% 90% 60%
16. Münster 9 88% 88% 66% 44% 22% 0% 3.11 88% 77% 77%
17. Ulm 10 70% 60% 40% 30% 10% 0% 2.1 50% 70% 50%
18. Hannover 9 88% 55% 44% 22% 0% 0% 2.11 55% 66% 33%
# Team P +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +3.5 Avg. G GF GA BTTS
1. Karlsruhe 10 80% 40% 30% 10% 1.8 50% 70% 40%
2. Darmstadt 9 77% 55% 44% 11% 1.89 55% 55% 33%
3. Schalke 10 70% 40% 20% 0% 1.3 40% 60% 30%
4. HSV 9 88% 33% 0% 0% 1.22 55% 55% 22%
5. Nürnberg 10 80% 60% 40% 10% 1.9 50% 70% 40%
6. Kaiserslautern 10 50% 30% 0% 0% 0.8 30% 40% 20%
7. Fürth 9 88% 66% 44% 11% 2.11 66% 77% 55%
8. Magdeburg 10 90% 60% 30% 0% 1.8 70% 60% 40%
9. Hertha 10 80% 50% 20% 0% 1.5 70% 60% 50%
10. Elversberg 9 44% 22% 0% 0% 0.67 22% 33% 11%
11. Fortuna 9 77% 22% 0% 0% 1 33% 55% 11%
12. Paderborn 10 50% 20% 0% 0% 0.7 40% 30% 20%
13. Köln 9 77% 33% 11% 0% 1.22 77% 22% 22%
14. Regensburg 9 77% 55% 22% 11% 1.78 22% 77% 22%
15. Braunschweig 10 80% 50% 30% 10% 1.7 30% 70% 20%
16. Münster 9 88% 55% 22% 0% 1.67 55% 77% 44%
17. Ulm 10 70% 30% 10% 0% 1.1 50% 50% 30%
18. Hannover 9 66% 33% 0% 0% 1 44% 33% 11%
# Team P +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +3.5 Avg. G GF GA BTTS
1. Karlsruhe 10 80% 50% 20% 10% 1.6 50% 50% 20%
2. Darmstadt 9 100% 88% 77% 11% 2.78 77% 77% 55%
3. Schalke 10 70% 50% 40% 0% 1.6 50% 40% 20%
4. HSV 9 100% 66% 44% 22% 2.33 77% 66% 44%
5. Nürnberg 10 90% 40% 20% 0% 1.5 60% 50% 20%
6. Kaiserslautern 10 80% 60% 50% 30% 2.3 70% 60% 50%
7. Fürth 9 88% 33% 22% 0% 1.44 33% 66% 11%
8. Magdeburg 10 90% 50% 50% 20% 2.2 80% 30% 20%
9. Hertha 10 90% 50% 20% 20% 1.8 70% 50% 30%
10. Elversberg 9 66% 44% 33% 0% 1.44 55% 33% 22%
11. Fortuna 9 88% 66% 22% 0% 1.78 88% 22% 22%
12. Paderborn 10 90% 90% 30% 20% 2.3 80% 80% 70%
13. Köln 9 66% 44% 22% 0% 1.33 44% 55% 33%
14. Regensburg 9 77% 66% 44% 22% 2.33 33% 77% 33%
15. Braunschweig 10 90% 50% 30% 0% 1.7 40% 60% 10%
16. Münster 9 77% 66% 0% 0% 1.44 55% 44% 22%
17. Ulm 10 40% 30% 20% 10% 1 30% 40% 30%
18. Hannover 9 77% 22% 11% 0% 1.11 33% 66% 22%