Statsplay

© 2025 stats'play. All rights reserved.

CFA Super League

League Rank Fixtures result Over/Under Corner Cards

All Home Away

Full Time 1st half 2nd half

#▼	Team▼	Avg. G▼	+0.5▼	+1.5▼	+2.5▼	+3.5▼	+4.5▼	+5.5▼	BTTS▼	GF▼	GA▼
1.	Qingdao	4.5	100%	100%	83%	83%	50%	33%	83%	100%	83%
2.	Shandong	4.38	87%	87%	87%	62%	50%	37%	62%	75%	75%
3.	Beijing	4.14	100%	100%	57%	57%	28%	28%	71%	100%	71%
4.	Meizhou	4.14	100%	100%	100%	71%	14%	14%	100%	100%	100%
5.	Shenzhen	3.86	100%	85%	85%	71%	14%	14%	57%	71%	85%
6.	Port	3.67	100%	100%	66%	50%	33%	16%	83%	100%	83%
7.	Shenhua	3.63	100%	100%	75%	62%	25%	0%	87%	100%	87%
8.	Three Towns	3.38	100%	87%	50%	50%	12%	12%	50%	50%	100%
9.	Tianjin	3.29	100%	85%	71%	57%	14%	0%	85%	100%	85%
10.	Yunnan Yukun	3.14	100%	85%	42%	42%	14%	14%	71%	85%	85%
11.	Zhejiang	3.14	100%	100%	57%	42%	14%	0%	57%	85%	71%
12.	Changchun	2.86	100%	100%	57%	28%	0%	0%	71%	71%	100%
13.	Henan	2.83	83%	66%	66%	50%	16%	0%	66%	66%	83%
14.	Dalian Yingbo	2.29	100%	85%	14%	14%	14%	0%	57%	85%	71%
15.	Hainiu	2.14	100%	42%	28%	28%	14%	0%	42%	42%	100%
16.	Chengdu	2	100%	71%	28%	0%	0%	0%	42%	100%	42%

#▼	Team▼	P▼	+0.5▼	+1.5▼	+2.5▼	+3.5▼	Avg. G▼	GF▼	GA▼	BTTS▼
1.	Qingdao	6	100%	50%	50%	16%	2.17	66%	83%	50%
2.	Shandong	8	87%	62%	37%	25%	2.13	75%	50%	37%
3.	Beijing	7	85%	42%	42%	14%	1.86	85%	42%	42%
4.	Meizhou	7	100%	57%	14%	14%	1.86	42%	71%	14%
5.	Shenzhen	7	85%	42%	28%	14%	1.71	28%	85%	28%
6.	Port	6	83%	50%	33%	16%	1.83	83%	16%	16%
7.	Shenhua	8	100%	37%	25%	12%	1.75	62%	75%	37%
8.	Three Towns	8	87%	50%	37%	25%	2	50%	62%	25%
9.	Tianjin	7	100%	42%	28%	0%	1.71	57%	71%	28%
10.	Yunnan Yukun	7	71%	28%	28%	0%	1.29	28%	57%	14%
11.	Zhejiang	7	100%	28%	14%	14%	1.57	71%	28%	0%
12.	Changchun	7	85%	57%	0%	0%	1.43	57%	71%	42%
13.	Henan	6	66%	0%	0%	0%	0.67	50%	16%	0%
14.	Dalian Yingbo	7	85%	14%	0%	0%	1	42%	57%	14%
15.	Hainiu	7	71%	28%	28%	14%	1.43	28%	71%	28%
16.	Chengdu	7	85%	28%	0%	0%	1.14	71%	28%	14%

#▼	Team▼	P▼	+0.5▼	+1.5▼	+2.5▼	+3.5▼	Avg. G▼	GF▼	GA▼	BTTS▼
1.	Qingdao	6	100%	50%	33%	33%	2.33	83%	50%	33%
2.	Shandong	8	75%	62%	50%	25%	2.25	50%	50%	25%
3.	Beijing	7	100%	57%	42%	28%	2.29	85%	42%	28%
4.	Meizhou	7	100%	85%	42%	0%	2.29	85%	57%	42%
5.	Shenzhen	7	85%	71%	42%	14%	2.14	71%	57%	42%
6.	Port	6	100%	66%	16%	0%	1.83	66%	66%	33%
7.	Shenhua	8	100%	37%	37%	12%	1.88	87%	25%	12%
8.	Three Towns	8	75%	25%	25%	12%	1.38	12%	75%	12%
9.	Tianjin	7	85%	42%	28%	0%	1.57	57%	71%	42%
10.	Yunnan Yukun	7	100%	42%	28%	14%	1.86	71%	42%	14%
11.	Zhejiang	7	85%	42%	14%	14%	1.57	28%	71%	14%
12.	Changchun	7	85%	57%	0%	0%	1.43	28%	85%	28%
13.	Henan	6	83%	66%	50%	16%	2.17	50%	83%	50%
14.	Dalian Yingbo	7	100%	14%	14%	0%	1.29	57%	42%	0%
15.	Hainiu	7	71%	0%	0%	0%	0.71	14%	57%	0%
16.	Chengdu	7	85%	0%	0%	0%	0.86	57%	28%	0%

Full Time 1st half 2nd half

#▼	Team▼	P▼	+0.5▼	+1.5▼	+2.5▼	+3.5▼	+4.5▼	+5.5▼	Avg. G▼	GF▼	GA▼	BTTS▼
1.	Qingdao	4	100%	100%	75%	75%	50%	50%	4.5	100%	75%	75%
2.	Shandong	4	75%	75%	75%	50%	25%	0%	3	50%	50%	25%
3.	Beijing	3	100%	100%	33%	33%	33%	33%	3.67	100%	66%	66%
4.	Meizhou	4	100%	100%	100%	75%	25%	25%	4.5	100%	100%	100%
5.	Shenzhen	3	100%	100%	100%	100%	33%	33%	5	100%	100%	100%
6.	Port	4	100%	100%	50%	25%	0%	0%	2.75	100%	75%	75%
7.	Shenhua	6	100%	100%	83%	66%	33%	0%	3.83	100%	83%	83%
8.	Three Towns	3	100%	100%	100%	100%	33%	33%	5.33	66%	100%	66%
9.	Tianjin	4	100%	75%	75%	75%	25%	0%	3.5	100%	75%	75%
10.	Yunnan Yukun	3	100%	66%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1.67	66%	66%	33%
11.	Zhejiang	3	100%	100%	66%	33%	0%	0%	3	100%	66%	66%
12.	Changchun	2	100%	100%	50%	0%	0%	0%	2.5	100%	100%	100%
13.	Henan	2	100%	100%	100%	100%	50%	0%	4.5	100%	100%	100%
14.	Dalian Yingbo	3	100%	66%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1.67	100%	33%	33%
15.	Hainiu	4	100%	50%	25%	25%	0%	0%	2	50%	100%	50%
16.	Chengdu	4	100%	75%	25%	0%	0%	0%	2	100%	50%	50%

#▼	Team▼	P▼	+0.5▼	+1.5▼	+2.5▼	+3.5▼	Avg. G▼	GF▼	GA▼	BTTS▼
1.	Qingdao	4	100%	50%	50%	25%	2.25	75%	75%	50%
2.	Shandong	4	75%	75%	25%	25%	2	50%	50%	25%
3.	Beijing	3	100%	33%	33%	0%	1.67	100%	33%	33%
4.	Meizhou	4	100%	50%	25%	25%	2	50%	75%	25%
5.	Shenzhen	3	100%	66%	33%	0%	2	66%	100%	66%
6.	Port	4	75%	25%	0%	0%	1	75%	0%	0%
7.	Shenhua	6	100%	50%	33%	16%	2	83%	66%	50%
8.	Three Towns	3	100%	100%	100%	66%	3.67	66%	66%	33%
9.	Tianjin	4	100%	25%	25%	0%	1.5	25%	75%	0%
10.	Yunnan Yukun	3	33%	0%	0%	0%	0.33	0%	33%	0%
11.	Zhejiang	3	100%	33%	0%	0%	1.33	100%	0%	0%
12.	Changchun	2	100%	50%	0%	0%	1.5	50%	100%	50%
13.	Henan	2	100%	0%	0%	0%	1	100%	0%	0%
14.	Dalian Yingbo	3	66%	0%	0%	0%	0.67	33%	33%	0%
15.	Hainiu	4	75%	25%	25%	0%	1.25	25%	75%	25%
16.	Chengdu	4	75%	25%	0%	0%	1	75%	25%	25%

#▼	Team▼	P▼	+0.5▼	+1.5▼	+2.5▼	+3.5▼	Avg. G▼	GF▼	GA▼	BTTS▼
1.	Qingdao	4	100%	50%	25%	25%	2.25	75%	50%	25%
2.	Shandong	4	50%	25%	25%	0%	1	25%	25%	0%
3.	Beijing	3	100%	33%	33%	33%	2	66%	33%	0%
4.	Meizhou	4	100%	100%	50%	0%	2.5	75%	75%	50%
5.	Shenzhen	3	100%	100%	66%	33%	3	100%	66%	66%
6.	Port	4	100%	50%	25%	0%	1.75	50%	75%	25%
7.	Shenhua	6	100%	33%	33%	16%	1.83	83%	33%	16%
8.	Three Towns	3	66%	33%	33%	33%	1.67	33%	66%	33%
9.	Tianjin	4	75%	75%	50%	0%	2	75%	75%	75%
10.	Yunnan Yukun	3	100%	33%	0%	0%	1.33	66%	33%	0%
11.	Zhejiang	3	100%	66%	0%	0%	1.67	33%	66%	0%
12.	Changchun	2	50%	50%	0%	0%	1	50%	50%	50%
13.	Henan	2	100%	100%	100%	50%	3.5	50%	100%	50%
14.	Dalian Yingbo	3	100%	0%	0%	0%	1	100%	0%	0%
15.	Hainiu	4	75%	0%	0%	0%	0.75	25%	50%	0%
16.	Chengdu	4	100%	0%	0%	0%	1	50%	50%	0%

Full Time 1st half 2nd half

#▼	Team▼	P▼	+0.5▼	+1.5▼	+2.5▼	+3.5▼	+4.5▼	+5.5▼	Avg. G▼	GF▼	GA▼	BTTS▼
1.	Qingdao	2	100%	100%	100%	100%	50%	0%	4.5	100%	100%	100%
2.	Shandong	4	100%	100%	100%	75%	75%	75%	5.75	100%	100%	100%
3.	Beijing	4	100%	100%	75%	75%	25%	25%	4.5	100%	75%	75%
4.	Meizhou	3	100%	100%	100%	66%	0%	0%	3.67	100%	100%	100%
5.	Shenzhen	4	100%	75%	75%	50%	0%	0%	3	50%	75%	25%
6.	Port	2	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	50%	5.5	100%	100%	100%
7.	Shenhua	2	100%	100%	50%	50%	0%	0%	3	100%	100%	100%
8.	Three Towns	5	100%	80%	20%	20%	0%	0%	2.2	40%	100%	40%
9.	Tianjin	3	100%	100%	66%	33%	0%	0%	3	100%	100%	100%
10.	Yunnan Yukun	4	100%	100%	75%	75%	25%	25%	4.25	100%	100%	100%
11.	Zhejiang	4	100%	100%	50%	50%	25%	0%	3.25	75%	75%	50%
12.	Changchun	5	100%	100%	60%	40%	0%	0%	3	60%	100%	60%
13.	Henan	4	75%	50%	50%	25%	0%	0%	2	50%	75%	50%
14.	Dalian Yingbo	4	100%	100%	25%	25%	25%	0%	2.75	75%	100%	75%
15.	Hainiu	3	100%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	2.33	33%	100%	33%
16.	Chengdu	3	100%	66%	33%	0%	0%	0%	2	100%	33%	33%

#▼	Team▼	P▼	+0.5▼	+1.5▼	+2.5▼	+3.5▼	Avg. G▼	GF▼	GA▼	BTTS▼
1.	Qingdao	2	100%	50%	50%	0%	2	50%	100%	50%
2.	Shandong	4	100%	50%	50%	25%	2.25	100%	50%	50%
3.	Beijing	4	75%	50%	50%	25%	2	75%	50%	50%
4.	Meizhou	3	100%	66%	0%	0%	1.67	33%	66%	0%
5.	Shenzhen	4	75%	25%	25%	25%	1.5	0%	75%	0%
6.	Port	2	100%	100%	100%	50%	3.5	100%	50%	50%
7.	Shenhua	2	100%	0%	0%	0%	1	0%	100%	0%
8.	Three Towns	5	80%	20%	0%	0%	1	40%	60%	20%
9.	Tianjin	3	100%	66%	33%	0%	2	100%	66%	66%
10.	Yunnan Yukun	4	100%	50%	50%	0%	2	50%	75%	25%
11.	Zhejiang	4	100%	25%	25%	25%	1.75	50%	50%	0%
12.	Changchun	5	80%	60%	0%	0%	1.4	60%	60%	40%
13.	Henan	4	50%	0%	0%	0%	0.5	25%	25%	0%
14.	Dalian Yingbo	4	100%	25%	0%	0%	1.25	50%	75%	25%
15.	Hainiu	3	66%	33%	33%	33%	1.67	33%	66%	33%
16.	Chengdu	3	100%	33%	0%	0%	1.33	66%	33%	0%

#▼	Team▼	P▼	+0.5▼	+1.5▼	+2.5▼	+3.5▼	Avg. G▼	GF▼	GA▼	BTTS▼
1.	Qingdao	2	100%	50%	50%	50%	2.5	100%	50%	50%
2.	Shandong	4	100%	100%	75%	50%	3.5	75%	75%	50%
3.	Beijing	4	100%	75%	50%	25%	2.5	100%	50%	50%
4.	Meizhou	3	100%	66%	33%	0%	2	100%	33%	33%
5.	Shenzhen	4	75%	50%	25%	0%	1.5	50%	50%	25%
6.	Port	2	100%	100%	0%	0%	2	100%	50%	50%
7.	Shenhua	2	100%	50%	50%	0%	2	100%	0%	0%
8.	Three Towns	5	80%	20%	20%	0%	1.2	0%	80%	0%
9.	Tianjin	3	100%	0%	0%	0%	1	33%	66%	0%
10.	Yunnan Yukun	4	100%	50%	50%	25%	2.25	75%	50%	25%
11.	Zhejiang	4	75%	25%	25%	25%	1.5	25%	75%	25%
12.	Changchun	5	100%	60%	0%	0%	1.6	20%	100%	20%
13.	Henan	4	75%	50%	25%	0%	1.5	50%	75%	50%
14.	Dalian Yingbo	4	100%	25%	25%	0%	1.5	25%	75%	0%
15.	Hainiu	3	66%	0%	0%	0%	0.67	0%	66%	0%
16.	Chengdu	3	66%	0%	0%	0%	0.67	66%	0%	0%

Notes slip is empty.

To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.

Login