statsplay
0
Soccer
Filter Matrix
Head to Head
Leagues
Favourite
Note slip
Profile
All Home Away
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ Avg. G▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ BTTS▼ GF▼ GA▼
1. Shandong Taishan 3.91 90% 81% 72% 54% 45% 27% 63% 72% 81%
2. Meizhou Hakka 3.82 100% 100% 90% 63% 9% 9% 90% 100% 90%
3. Qingdao West Coast 3.6 90% 90% 70% 60% 30% 20% 70% 90% 70%
4. Shanghai Port 3.6 100% 100% 70% 50% 30% 10% 80% 100% 80%
5. Beijing Guoan 3.5 100% 90% 50% 40% 20% 20% 60% 100% 60%
6. Yunnan Yukun 3.36 90% 81% 54% 54% 36% 9% 72% 81% 81%
7. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 3.27 100% 81% 63% 45% 18% 9% 72% 90% 81%
8. Zhejiang 3.27 100% 100% 63% 36% 18% 9% 63% 81% 81%
9. Henan Songshan Longmen 3.2 90% 70% 70% 50% 20% 10% 70% 70% 90%
10. Shanghai Shenhua 3.18 100% 81% 63% 54% 18% 0% 72% 90% 81%
11. Wuhan Three Towns 3.18 100% 90% 54% 36% 9% 9% 54% 54% 100%
12. Shenzhen City 3 90% 72% 63% 45% 9% 9% 45% 63% 72%
13. Changchun Yatai 2.91 90% 90% 63% 27% 9% 9% 63% 63% 90%
14. Dalian Yingbo FC 2.45 100% 90% 18% 18% 18% 0% 54% 72% 81%
15. Qingdao Hainiu 2.36 100% 63% 36% 27% 9% 0% 54% 63% 90%
16. Chengdu Rongcheng 2.27 100% 72% 45% 9% 0% 0% 54% 100% 54%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Shandong Taishan 11 72% 54% 27% 18% 1.73 63% 36% 27%
2. Meizhou Hakka 11 81% 36% 9% 9% 1.36 36% 54% 9%
3. Qingdao West Coast 10 70% 30% 30% 10% 1.4 50% 50% 30%
4. Shanghai Port 10 90% 60% 30% 10% 1.9 90% 30% 30%
5. Beijing Guoan 10 90% 50% 30% 10% 1.8 90% 40% 40%
6. Yunnan Yukun 11 72% 36% 18% 0% 1.27 18% 63% 9%
7. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 11 90% 36% 27% 9% 1.64 54% 63% 27%
8. Zhejiang 11 81% 27% 18% 18% 1.45 54% 36% 9%
9. Henan Songshan Longmen 10 70% 10% 10% 10% 1 40% 40% 10%
10. Shanghai Shenhua 11 81% 27% 18% 9% 1.36 45% 63% 27%
11. Wuhan Three Towns 11 81% 45% 27% 18% 1.73 36% 63% 18%
12. Shenzhen City 11 72% 27% 18% 9% 1.27 27% 63% 18%
13. Changchun Yatai 11 72% 45% 9% 9% 1.36 45% 63% 36%
14. Dalian Yingbo FC 11 81% 27% 0% 0% 1.09 45% 45% 9%
15. Qingdao Hainiu 11 63% 18% 18% 9% 1.09 27% 54% 18%
16. Chengdu Rongcheng 11 90% 27% 9% 0% 1.27 81% 27% 18%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Shandong Taishan 11 81% 63% 45% 18% 2.18 45% 63% 27%
2. Meizhou Hakka 11 100% 81% 54% 9% 2.45 81% 63% 45%
3. Qingdao West Coast 10 90% 60% 40% 20% 2.2 80% 50% 40%
4. Shanghai Port 10 90% 50% 20% 10% 1.7 50% 70% 30%
5. Beijing Guoan 10 80% 40% 30% 20% 1.7 70% 30% 20%
6. Yunnan Yukun 11 90% 54% 45% 18% 2.09 72% 45% 27%
7. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 11 81% 54% 27% 0% 1.64 54% 63% 36%
8. Zhejiang 11 90% 63% 18% 9% 1.82 45% 81% 36%
9. Henan Songshan Longmen 10 80% 70% 60% 10% 2.2 60% 70% 50%
10. Shanghai Shenhua 11 90% 36% 36% 18% 1.82 81% 27% 18%
11. Wuhan Three Towns 11 72% 36% 27% 9% 1.45 27% 63% 18%
12. Shenzhen City 11 72% 54% 36% 9% 1.73 54% 45% 27%
13. Changchun Yatai 11 81% 63% 9% 0% 1.55 36% 81% 36%
14. Dalian Yingbo FC 11 90% 27% 18% 0% 1.36 45% 54% 9%
15. Qingdao Hainiu 11 81% 27% 18% 0% 1.27 36% 54% 9%
16. Chengdu Rongcheng 11 81% 18% 0% 0% 1 63% 36% 18%
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Shandong Taishan 6 83% 66% 50% 33% 16% 0% 2.5 50% 66% 33%
2. Meizhou Hakka 6 100% 100% 100% 66% 16% 16% 4.17 100% 83% 83%
3. Qingdao West Coast 7 85% 85% 57% 57% 28% 28% 3.43 85% 57% 57%
4. Shanghai Port 6 100% 100% 66% 33% 0% 0% 3 100% 83% 83%
5. Beijing Guoan 4 100% 75% 25% 25% 25% 25% 3 100% 50% 50%
6. Yunnan Yukun 5 100% 80% 40% 40% 40% 0% 3 80% 80% 60%
7. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 5 100% 80% 60% 60% 20% 0% 3.2 100% 60% 60%
8. Zhejiang 5 100% 100% 80% 40% 20% 20% 3.6 100% 80% 80%
9. Henan Songshan Longmen 5 100% 100% 100% 80% 40% 20% 4.6 100% 100% 100%
10. Shanghai Shenhua 6 100% 100% 83% 66% 33% 0% 3.83 100% 83% 83%
11. Wuhan Three Towns 5 100% 100% 80% 60% 20% 20% 4.2 60% 100% 60%
12. Shenzhen City 5 100% 80% 60% 60% 20% 20% 3.6 100% 80% 80%
13. Changchun Yatai 4 75% 75% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 75% 75% 75%
14. Dalian Yingbo FC 5 100% 80% 20% 20% 20% 0% 2.4 80% 60% 40%
15. Qingdao Hainiu 6 100% 66% 33% 16% 0% 0% 2.17 66% 83% 50%
16. Chengdu Rongcheng 6 100% 66% 33% 0% 0% 0% 2 100% 50% 50%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Shandong Taishan 6 50% 50% 16% 16% 1.33 33% 33% 16%
2. Meizhou Hakka 6 66% 33% 16% 16% 1.33 33% 50% 16%
3. Qingdao West Coast 7 71% 28% 28% 14% 1.43 57% 42% 28%
4. Shanghai Port 6 83% 50% 16% 0% 1.5 83% 33% 33%
5. Beijing Guoan 4 100% 25% 25% 0% 1.5 100% 25% 25%
6. Yunnan Yukun 5 60% 20% 0% 0% 0.8 0% 60% 0%
7. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 5 80% 20% 20% 0% 1.2 20% 60% 0%
8. Zhejiang 5 80% 40% 20% 20% 1.6 80% 20% 20%
9. Henan Songshan Longmen 5 80% 20% 20% 20% 1.4 60% 40% 20%
10. Shanghai Shenhua 6 100% 50% 33% 16% 2 83% 66% 50%
11. Wuhan Three Towns 5 100% 80% 60% 40% 2.8 40% 80% 20%
12. Shenzhen City 5 100% 40% 20% 0% 1.6 60% 80% 40%
13. Changchun Yatai 4 75% 25% 0% 0% 1 25% 75% 25%
14. Dalian Yingbo FC 5 80% 40% 0% 0% 1.2 40% 40% 0%
15. Qingdao Hainiu 6 66% 16% 16% 0% 1 16% 66% 16%
16. Chengdu Rongcheng 6 83% 16% 0% 0% 1 83% 16% 16%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Shandong Taishan 6 66% 33% 16% 0% 1.17 33% 50% 16%
2. Meizhou Hakka 6 100% 100% 66% 16% 2.83 83% 66% 50%
3. Qingdao West Coast 7 85% 57% 28% 14% 2 71% 42% 28%
4. Shanghai Port 6 100% 33% 16% 0% 1.5 33% 83% 16%
5. Beijing Guoan 4 75% 25% 25% 25% 1.5 50% 25% 0%
6. Yunnan Yukun 5 100% 60% 40% 20% 2.2 80% 40% 20%
7. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 5 80% 80% 40% 0% 2 80% 60% 60%
8. Zhejiang 5 100% 80% 20% 0% 2 60% 80% 40%
9. Henan Songshan Longmen 5 100% 100% 100% 20% 3.2 80% 80% 60%
10. Shanghai Shenhua 6 100% 33% 33% 16% 1.83 83% 33% 16%
11. Wuhan Three Towns 5 60% 40% 20% 20% 1.4 40% 40% 20%
12. Shenzhen City 5 80% 60% 40% 20% 2 80% 40% 40%
13. Changchun Yatai 4 50% 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 50% 50%
14. Dalian Yingbo FC 5 80% 20% 20% 0% 1.2 80% 20% 20%
15. Qingdao Hainiu 6 83% 16% 16% 0% 1.17 50% 33% 0%
16. Chengdu Rongcheng 6 83% 16% 0% 0% 1 50% 50% 16%
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Shandong Taishan 5 100% 100% 100% 80% 80% 60% 5.6 100% 100% 100%
2. Meizhou Hakka 5 100% 100% 80% 60% 0% 0% 3.4 100% 100% 100%
3. Qingdao West Coast 3 100% 100% 100% 66% 33% 0% 4 100% 100% 100%
4. Shanghai Port 4 100% 100% 75% 75% 75% 25% 4.5 100% 75% 75%
5. Beijing Guoan 6 100% 100% 66% 50% 16% 16% 3.83 100% 66% 66%
6. Yunnan Yukun 6 83% 83% 66% 66% 33% 16% 3.67 83% 83% 83%
7. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 6 100% 83% 66% 33% 16% 16% 3.33 83% 100% 83%
8. Zhejiang 6 100% 100% 50% 33% 16% 0% 3 66% 83% 50%
9. Henan Songshan Longmen 5 80% 40% 40% 20% 0% 0% 1.8 40% 80% 40%
10. Shanghai Shenhua 5 100% 60% 40% 40% 0% 0% 2.4 80% 80% 60%
11. Wuhan Three Towns 6 100% 83% 33% 16% 0% 0% 2.33 50% 100% 50%
12. Shenzhen City 6 83% 66% 66% 33% 0% 0% 2.5 33% 66% 16%
13. Changchun Yatai 7 100% 100% 71% 42% 14% 14% 3.43 57% 100% 57%
14. Dalian Yingbo FC 6 100% 100% 16% 16% 16% 0% 2.5 66% 100% 66%
15. Qingdao Hainiu 5 100% 60% 40% 40% 20% 0% 2.6 60% 100% 60%
16. Chengdu Rongcheng 5 100% 80% 60% 20% 0% 0% 2.6 100% 60% 60%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Shandong Taishan 5 100% 60% 40% 20% 2.2 100% 40% 40%
2. Meizhou Hakka 5 100% 40% 0% 0% 1.4 40% 60% 0%
3. Qingdao West Coast 3 66% 33% 33% 0% 1.33 33% 66% 33%
4. Shanghai Port 4 100% 75% 50% 25% 2.5 100% 25% 25%
5. Beijing Guoan 6 83% 66% 33% 16% 2 83% 50% 50%
6. Yunnan Yukun 6 83% 50% 33% 0% 1.67 33% 66% 16%
7. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 6 100% 50% 33% 16% 2 83% 66% 50%
8. Zhejiang 6 83% 16% 16% 16% 1.33 33% 50% 0%
9. Henan Songshan Longmen 5 60% 0% 0% 0% 0.6 20% 40% 0%
10. Shanghai Shenhua 5 60% 0% 0% 0% 0.6 0% 60% 0%
11. Wuhan Three Towns 6 66% 16% 0% 0% 0.83 33% 50% 16%
12. Shenzhen City 6 50% 16% 16% 16% 1 0% 50% 0%
13. Changchun Yatai 7 71% 57% 14% 14% 1.57 57% 57% 42%
14. Dalian Yingbo FC 6 83% 16% 0% 0% 1 50% 50% 16%
15. Qingdao Hainiu 5 60% 20% 20% 20% 1.2 40% 40% 20%
16. Chengdu Rongcheng 5 100% 40% 20% 0% 1.6 80% 40% 20%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Shandong Taishan 5 100% 100% 80% 40% 3.4 60% 80% 40%
2. Meizhou Hakka 5 100% 60% 40% 0% 2 80% 60% 40%
3. Qingdao West Coast 3 100% 66% 66% 33% 2.67 100% 66% 66%
4. Shanghai Port 4 75% 75% 25% 25% 2 75% 50% 50%
5. Beijing Guoan 6 83% 50% 33% 16% 1.83 83% 33% 33%
6. Yunnan Yukun 6 83% 50% 50% 16% 2 66% 50% 33%
7. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 6 83% 33% 16% 0% 1.33 33% 66% 16%
8. Zhejiang 6 83% 50% 16% 16% 1.67 33% 83% 33%
9. Henan Songshan Longmen 5 60% 40% 20% 0% 1.2 40% 60% 40%
10. Shanghai Shenhua 5 80% 40% 40% 20% 1.8 80% 20% 20%
11. Wuhan Three Towns 6 83% 33% 33% 0% 1.5 16% 83% 16%
12. Shenzhen City 6 66% 50% 33% 0% 1.5 33% 50% 16%
13. Changchun Yatai 7 100% 71% 14% 0% 1.86 28% 100% 28%
14. Dalian Yingbo FC 6 100% 33% 16% 0% 1.5 16% 83% 0%
15. Qingdao Hainiu 5 80% 40% 20% 0% 1.4 20% 80% 20%
16. Chengdu Rongcheng 5 80% 20% 0% 0% 1 80% 20% 20%