statsplay
0
Soccer
Basketball
Ice Hockey
Filter Matrix
Head to Head
Leagues
Favourite
Note slip
Profile
All Home Away
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ Avg. G▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ BTTS▼ GF▼ GA▼
1. Becamex Bình Dương 2.62 100% 69% 53% 23% 15% 0% 61% 69% 92%
2. Nam Định 2.46 84% 61% 53% 23% 23% 0% 38% 61% 61%
3. Công An Hà Nội 2.46 92% 69% 46% 7% 7% 7% 46% 76% 61%
4. Thanh Hóa 2.38 100% 69% 38% 23% 7% 0% 69% 92% 76%
5. Đà Nẵng 2.31 84% 69% 38% 23% 15% 0% 46% 46% 84%
6. Viettel 2.23 84% 61% 46% 15% 15% 0% 53% 76% 61%
7. Gia Lai 2.23 92% 69% 30% 23% 7% 0% 46% 76% 61%
8. Hải Phòng 2.23 92% 69% 30% 23% 7% 0% 53% 69% 76%
9. Hà Nội 2.15 100% 76% 30% 7% 0% 0% 53% 92% 61%
10. Quảng Nam 2.15 76% 46% 30% 23% 15% 7% 38% 53% 61%
11. SLNA 2.15 84% 61% 30% 23% 15% 0% 38% 53% 69%
12. Hồ Chí Minh 2.08 76% 69% 46% 15% 0% 0% 38% 46% 69%
13. Bình Định 2.08 84% 53% 46% 15% 7% 0% 46% 69% 61%
14. Hà Tĩnh 1.69 76% 61% 15% 15% 0% 0% 61% 76% 61%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Becamex Bình Dương 13 69% 30% 15% 7% 1.23 38% 46% 15%
2. Nam Định 13 61% 23% 7% 7% 1 38% 23% 0%
3. Công An Hà Nội 13 61% 23% 7% 7% 1 46% 30% 15%
4. Thanh Hóa 13 53% 23% 15% 0% 0.92 46% 30% 23%
5. Đà Nẵng 13 53% 15% 15% 7% 0.92 15% 53% 15%
6. Viettel 13 61% 30% 15% 7% 1.15 53% 23% 15%
7. Gia Lai 13 76% 38% 7% 0% 1.23 61% 30% 15%
8. Hải Phòng 13 84% 30% 7% 7% 1.31 38% 53% 7%
9. Hà Nội 13 69% 7% 0% 0% 0.77 46% 30% 7%
10. Quảng Nam 13 38% 23% 15% 15% 0.92 15% 38% 15%
11. SLNA 13 61% 15% 0% 0% 0.77 23% 46% 7%
12. Hồ Chí Minh 13 61% 15% 0% 0% 0.77 15% 46% 0%
13. Bình Định 13 61% 30% 7% 0% 1 53% 30% 23%
14. Hà Tĩnh 13 61% 30% 7% 0% 1 38% 46% 23%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Becamex Bình Dương 13 84% 46% 7% 0% 1.38 53% 46% 15%
2. Nam Định 13 76% 38% 15% 15% 1.46 46% 46% 15%
3. Công An Hà Nội 13 76% 38% 23% 7% 1.46 53% 46% 23%
4. Thanh Hóa 13 69% 46% 15% 0% 1.31 53% 38% 23%
5. Đà Nẵng 13 76% 38% 15% 7% 1.38 30% 61% 15%
6. Viettel 13 61% 30% 15% 0% 1.08 38% 46% 23%
7. Gia Lai 13 53% 23% 7% 0% 0.85 30% 30% 7%
8. Hải Phòng 13 61% 15% 15% 0% 0.92 46% 23% 7%
9. Hà Nội 13 76% 46% 15% 0% 1.38 69% 38% 30%
10. Quảng Nam 13 69% 30% 15% 7% 1.23 53% 38% 23%
11. SLNA 13 61% 38% 23% 15% 1.38 30% 53% 23%
12. Hồ Chí Minh 13 61% 38% 30% 0% 1.31 30% 61% 30%
13. Bình Định 13 53% 30% 15% 7% 1.08 15% 53% 15%
14. Hà Tĩnh 13 53% 15% 0% 0% 0.69 46% 15% 7%
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Becamex Bình Dương 6 100% 100% 83% 50% 33% 0% 3.67 100% 83% 83%
2. Nam Định 6 100% 66% 66% 33% 33% 0% 3 66% 66% 33%
3. Công An Hà Nội 6 100% 66% 50% 16% 16% 16% 3 83% 50% 33%
4. Thanh Hóa 6 100% 83% 33% 16% 0% 0% 2.33 100% 83% 83%
5. Đà Nẵng 6 83% 83% 16% 16% 0% 0% 2 66% 83% 66%
6. Viettel 7 100% 71% 57% 0% 0% 0% 2.29 85% 85% 71%
7. Gia Lai 6 83% 66% 16% 16% 0% 0% 1.83 83% 50% 50%
8. Hải Phòng 6 100% 83% 33% 16% 16% 0% 2.5 83% 66% 50%
9. Hà Nội 7 100% 57% 28% 14% 0% 0% 2 85% 57% 42%
10. Quảng Nam 7 85% 71% 42% 28% 14% 0% 2.43 71% 71% 57%
11. SLNA 7 71% 28% 14% 14% 14% 0% 1.43 42% 42% 14%
12. Hồ Chí Minh 7 71% 57% 42% 14% 0% 0% 1.86 42% 57% 28%
13. Bình Định 7 85% 57% 57% 28% 14% 0% 2.43 85% 57% 57%
14. Hà Tĩnh 7 57% 28% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.86 57% 28% 28%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Becamex Bình Dương 6 100% 66% 33% 16% 2.17 83% 50% 33%
2. Nam Định 6 66% 0% 0% 0% 0.67 33% 33% 0%
3. Công An Hà Nội 6 50% 50% 16% 16% 1.33 50% 33% 33%
4. Thanh Hóa 6 50% 16% 0% 0% 0.67 33% 33% 16%
5. Đà Nẵng 6 50% 16% 16% 0% 0.83 16% 50% 16%
6. Viettel 7 85% 28% 14% 0% 1.29 71% 28% 14%
7. Gia Lai 6 66% 16% 0% 0% 0.83 66% 16% 16%
8. Hải Phòng 6 83% 66% 16% 16% 1.83 50% 50% 16%
9. Hà Nội 7 85% 14% 0% 0% 1 42% 57% 14%
10. Quảng Nam 7 42% 28% 14% 14% 1 14% 42% 14%
11. SLNA 7 42% 14% 0% 0% 0.57 14% 28% 0%
12. Hồ Chí Minh 7 57% 14% 0% 0% 0.71 14% 42% 0%
13. Bình Định 7 57% 14% 14% 0% 0.86 57% 14% 14%
14. Hà Tĩnh 7 42% 0% 0% 0% 0.43 28% 14% 0%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Becamex Bình Dương 6 100% 50% 0% 0% 1.5 66% 33% 0%
2. Nam Định 6 100% 66% 33% 33% 2.33 66% 50% 16%
3. Công An Hà Nội 6 83% 33% 33% 16% 1.67 66% 33% 16%
4. Thanh Hóa 6 83% 66% 16% 0% 1.67 66% 50% 33%
5. Đà Nẵng 6 83% 33% 0% 0% 1.17 50% 66% 33%
6. Viettel 7 57% 28% 14% 0% 1 28% 57% 28%
7. Gia Lai 6 33% 16% 16% 0% 0.67 33% 16% 16%
8. Hải Phòng 6 66% 0% 0% 0% 0.67 50% 16% 0%
9. Hà Nội 7 57% 28% 14% 0% 1 57% 14% 14%
10. Quảng Nam 7 85% 42% 14% 0% 1.43 71% 42% 28%
11. SLNA 7 42% 28% 14% 0% 0.86 28% 28% 14%
12. Hồ Chí Minh 7 57% 28% 28% 0% 1.14 28% 57% 28%
13. Bình Định 7 57% 57% 28% 14% 1.57 28% 57% 28%
14. Hà Tĩnh 7 42% 0% 0% 0% 0.43 28% 14% 0%
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Becamex Bình Dương 7 100% 42% 28% 0% 0% 0% 1.71 42% 100% 42%
2. Nam Định 7 71% 57% 42% 14% 14% 0% 2 57% 57% 42%
3. Công An Hà Nội 7 85% 71% 42% 0% 0% 0% 2 71% 71% 57%
4. Thanh Hóa 7 100% 57% 42% 28% 14% 0% 2.43 85% 71% 57%
5. Đà Nẵng 7 85% 57% 57% 28% 28% 0% 2.57 28% 85% 28%
6. Viettel 6 66% 50% 33% 33% 33% 0% 2.17 66% 33% 33%
7. Gia Lai 7 100% 71% 42% 28% 14% 0% 2.57 71% 71% 42%
8. Hải Phòng 7 85% 57% 28% 28% 0% 0% 2 57% 85% 57%
9. Hà Nội 6 100% 100% 33% 0% 0% 0% 2.33 100% 66% 66%
10. Quảng Nam 6 66% 16% 16% 16% 16% 16% 1.83 33% 50% 16%
11. SLNA 6 100% 100% 50% 33% 16% 0% 3 66% 100% 66%
12. Hồ Chí Minh 6 83% 83% 50% 16% 0% 0% 2.33 50% 83% 50%
13. Bình Định 6 83% 50% 33% 0% 0% 0% 1.67 50% 66% 33%
14. Hà Tĩnh 6 100% 100% 33% 33% 0% 0% 2.67 100% 100% 100%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Becamex Bình Dương 7 42% 0% 0% 0% 0.43 0% 42% 0%
2. Nam Định 7 57% 42% 14% 14% 1.29 42% 14% 0%
3. Công An Hà Nội 7 71% 0% 0% 0% 0.71 42% 28% 0%
4. Thanh Hóa 7 57% 28% 28% 0% 1.14 57% 28% 28%
5. Đà Nẵng 7 57% 14% 14% 14% 1 14% 57% 14%
6. Viettel 6 33% 33% 16% 16% 1 33% 16% 16%
7. Gia Lai 7 85% 57% 14% 0% 1.57 57% 42% 14%
8. Hải Phòng 7 85% 0% 0% 0% 0.86 28% 57% 0%
9. Hà Nội 6 50% 0% 0% 0% 0.5 50% 0% 0%
10. Quảng Nam 6 33% 16% 16% 16% 0.83 16% 33% 16%
11. SLNA 6 83% 16% 0% 0% 1 33% 66% 16%
12. Hồ Chí Minh 6 66% 16% 0% 0% 0.83 16% 50% 0%
13. Bình Định 6 66% 50% 0% 0% 1.17 50% 50% 33%
14. Hà Tĩnh 6 83% 66% 16% 0% 1.67 50% 83% 50%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Becamex Bình Dương 7 71% 42% 14% 0% 1.29 42% 57% 28%
2. Nam Định 7 57% 14% 0% 0% 0.71 28% 42% 14%
3. Công An Hà Nội 7 71% 42% 14% 0% 1.29 42% 57% 28%
4. Thanh Hóa 7 57% 28% 14% 0% 1 42% 28% 14%
5. Đà Nẵng 7 71% 42% 28% 14% 1.57 14% 57% 0%
6. Viettel 6 66% 33% 16% 0% 1.17 50% 33% 16%
7. Gia Lai 7 71% 28% 0% 0% 1 28% 42% 0%
8. Hải Phòng 7 57% 28% 28% 0% 1.14 42% 28% 14%
9. Hà Nội 6 100% 66% 16% 0% 1.83 83% 66% 50%
10. Quảng Nam 6 50% 16% 16% 16% 1 33% 33% 16%
11. SLNA 6 83% 50% 33% 33% 2 33% 83% 33%
12. Hồ Chí Minh 6 66% 50% 33% 0% 1.5 33% 66% 33%
13. Bình Định 6 50% 0% 0% 0% 0.5 0% 50% 0%
14. Hà Tĩnh 6 66% 33% 0% 0% 1 66% 16% 16%