statsplay
0
Soccer
Filter Matrix
Head to Head
Leagues
Favourite
Note slip
Profile
All Home Away
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ Avg. G▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ BTTS▼ GF▼ GA▼
1. Binh Duong 2.76 100% 76% 61% 28% 9% 0% 61% 71% 90%
2. Viettel 2.67 90% 71% 57% 28% 14% 4% 57% 80% 66%
3. Da Nang 2.58 89% 73% 42% 26% 21% 5% 52% 52% 89%
4. Nam Dinh 2.55 90% 75% 50% 25% 15% 0% 45% 75% 60%
5. Hanoi FC 2.55 100% 85% 50% 15% 5% 0% 55% 90% 65%
6. Thanh Hoa 2.5 95% 75% 45% 30% 5% 0% 75% 90% 80%
7. Quang Nam 2.48 85% 66% 47% 23% 9% 4% 57% 66% 76%
8. Cong An Ha Noi 2.45 90% 75% 50% 10% 5% 5% 55% 80% 65%
9. Gia Lai 2.35 95% 65% 40% 30% 5% 0% 40% 70% 65%
10. Binh Dinh 2.06 88% 50% 44% 16% 5% 0% 44% 61% 72%
11. Hai Phong 2.06 94% 61% 27% 16% 5% 0% 44% 66% 72%
12. Song Lam Nghe An 2.05 90% 65% 25% 15% 10% 0% 50% 65% 75%
13. Ho Chi Minh 2 80% 66% 38% 14% 0% 0% 47% 57% 71%
14. Hong Linh Ha Tinh 1.71 80% 52% 19% 19% 0% 0% 52% 76% 57%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Binh Duong 21 71% 42% 14% 4% 1.33 38% 57% 23%
2. Viettel 21 71% 38% 19% 9% 1.43 57% 38% 23%
3. Da Nang 19 63% 26% 15% 10% 1.21 26% 57% 21%
4. Nam Dinh 20 75% 35% 10% 5% 1.25 55% 30% 10%
5. Hanoi FC 20 75% 10% 5% 0% 0.9 50% 30% 5%
6. Thanh Hoa 20 55% 25% 10% 0% 0.9 40% 40% 25%
7. Quang Nam 21 47% 28% 14% 9% 1 23% 47% 23%
8. Cong An Ha Noi 20 70% 35% 5% 5% 1.15 60% 40% 30%
9. Gia Lai 20 70% 35% 10% 0% 1.15 50% 35% 15%
10. Binh Dinh 18 61% 33% 5% 0% 1 50% 38% 27%
11. Hai Phong 18 66% 22% 5% 5% 1 27% 44% 5%
12. Song Lam Nghe An 20 55% 20% 0% 0% 0.75 30% 40% 15%
13. Ho Chi Minh 21 57% 14% 0% 0% 0.71 23% 38% 4%
14. Hong Linh Ha Tinh 21 61% 23% 4% 0% 0.9 42% 38% 19%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Binh Duong 21 85% 47% 9% 0% 1.43 47% 57% 19%
2. Viettel 21 76% 33% 14% 0% 1.24 52% 47% 23%
3. Da Nang 19 78% 31% 15% 10% 1.37 26% 68% 15%
4. Nam Dinh 20 75% 35% 10% 10% 1.3 55% 35% 15%
5. Hanoi FC 20 80% 55% 25% 5% 1.65 75% 40% 35%
6. Thanh Hoa 20 75% 50% 20% 5% 1.5 60% 45% 30%
7. Quang Nam 21 76% 42% 19% 9% 1.48 52% 57% 33%
8. Cong An Ha Noi 20 70% 40% 15% 5% 1.3 55% 35% 20%
9. Gia Lai 20 60% 30% 15% 5% 1.1 35% 35% 10%
10. Binh Dinh 18 61% 27% 11% 5% 1.06 16% 55% 11%
11. Hai Phong 18 72% 16% 16% 0% 1.06 50% 33% 11%
12. Song Lam Nghe An 20 65% 35% 20% 10% 1.3 35% 55% 25%
13. Ho Chi Minh 21 66% 33% 23% 4% 1.29 38% 57% 28%
14. Hong Linh Ha Tinh 21 57% 19% 4% 0% 0.81 42% 23% 9%
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Binh Duong 10 100% 100% 80% 30% 20% 0% 3.3 90% 90% 80%
2. Viettel 11 100% 72% 54% 18% 9% 9% 2.64 81% 72% 54%
3. Da Nang 8 87% 87% 25% 12% 0% 0% 2.13 75% 87% 75%
4. Nam Dinh 10 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 3 80% 70% 50%
5. Hanoi FC 11 100% 72% 54% 27% 9% 0% 2.64 81% 72% 54%
6. Thanh Hoa 11 100% 90% 45% 27% 0% 0% 2.64 100% 90% 90%
7. Quang Nam 11 90% 81% 63% 27% 9% 0% 2.73 72% 81% 63%
8. Cong An Ha Noi 10 90% 70% 50% 20% 10% 10% 2.7 80% 60% 50%
9. Gia Lai 10 90% 60% 30% 20% 0% 0% 2 70% 50% 30%
10. Binh Dinh 9 88% 44% 44% 22% 11% 0% 2.11 66% 66% 44%
11. Hai Phong 8 100% 62% 25% 12% 12% 0% 2.13 87% 50% 37%
12. Song Lam Nghe An 10 80% 40% 10% 10% 10% 0% 1.5 60% 50% 30%
13. Ho Chi Minh 10 80% 50% 30% 10% 0% 0% 1.7 50% 60% 30%
14. Hong Linh Ha Tinh 11 63% 45% 18% 18% 0% 0% 1.45 63% 45% 45%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Binh Duong 10 90% 60% 20% 10% 1.8 70% 60% 40%
2. Viettel 11 81% 36% 27% 9% 1.64 63% 36% 18%
3. Da Nang 8 62% 25% 12% 0% 1 37% 50% 25%
4. Nam Dinh 10 80% 20% 0% 0% 1 50% 40% 10%
5. Hanoi FC 11 90% 18% 9% 0% 1.18 54% 45% 9%
6. Thanh Hoa 11 54% 27% 0% 0% 0.82 36% 45% 27%
7. Quang Nam 11 45% 27% 9% 9% 0.91 18% 45% 18%
8. Cong An Ha Noi 10 60% 50% 10% 10% 1.3 60% 40% 40%
9. Gia Lai 10 60% 20% 10% 0% 0.9 50% 20% 10%
10. Binh Dinh 9 55% 11% 11% 0% 0.78 44% 22% 11%
11. Hai Phong 8 62% 50% 12% 12% 1.38 37% 37% 12%
12. Song Lam Nghe An 10 50% 30% 0% 0% 0.8 30% 40% 20%
13. Ho Chi Minh 10 50% 10% 0% 0% 0.6 20% 30% 0%
14. Hong Linh Ha Tinh 11 54% 9% 0% 0% 0.64 36% 27% 9%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Binh Duong 10 90% 50% 10% 0% 1.5 50% 50% 10%
2. Viettel 11 72% 18% 9% 0% 1 45% 45% 18%
3. Da Nang 8 87% 25% 0% 0% 1.13 37% 75% 25%
4. Nam Dinh 10 100% 60% 20% 20% 2 80% 40% 20%
5. Hanoi FC 11 63% 45% 27% 9% 1.45 63% 36% 36%
6. Thanh Hoa 11 90% 63% 18% 9% 1.82 72% 54% 36%
7. Quang Nam 11 90% 54% 27% 9% 1.82 63% 63% 36%
8. Cong An Ha Noi 10 70% 40% 20% 10% 1.4 60% 30% 20%
9. Gia Lai 10 50% 20% 20% 0% 0.9 40% 20% 10%
10. Binh Dinh 9 55% 44% 22% 11% 1.33 22% 55% 22%
11. Hai Phong 8 75% 0% 0% 0% 0.75 62% 12% 0%
12. Song Lam Nghe An 10 40% 20% 10% 0% 0.7 30% 20% 10%
13. Ho Chi Minh 10 60% 30% 20% 0% 1.1 30% 60% 30%
14. Hong Linh Ha Tinh 11 54% 18% 9% 0% 0.82 36% 27% 9%
Full Time 1st half 2nd half
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ +4.5▼ +5.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Binh Duong 11 100% 54% 45% 27% 0% 0% 2.27 54% 90% 45%
2. Viettel 10 80% 70% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2.7 80% 60% 60%
3. Da Nang 11 90% 63% 54% 36% 36% 9% 2.91 36% 90% 36%
4. Nam Dinh 10 80% 70% 40% 10% 10% 0% 2.1 70% 50% 40%
5. Hanoi FC 9 100% 100% 44% 0% 0% 0% 2.44 100% 55% 55%
6. Thanh Hoa 9 88% 55% 44% 33% 11% 0% 2.33 77% 66% 55%
7. Quang Nam 10 80% 50% 30% 20% 10% 10% 2.2 60% 70% 50%
8. Cong An Ha Noi 10 90% 80% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2.2 80% 70% 60%
9. Gia Lai 10 100% 70% 50% 40% 10% 0% 2.7 70% 80% 50%
10. Binh Dinh 9 88% 55% 44% 11% 0% 0% 2 55% 77% 44%
11. Hai Phong 10 90% 60% 30% 20% 0% 0% 2 50% 90% 50%
12. Song Lam Nghe An 10 100% 90% 40% 20% 10% 0% 2.6 70% 100% 70%
13. Ho Chi Minh 11 81% 81% 45% 18% 0% 0% 2.27 63% 81% 63%
14. Hong Linh Ha Tinh 10 100% 60% 20% 20% 0% 0% 2 90% 70% 60%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Binh Duong 11 54% 27% 9% 0% 0.91 9% 54% 9%
2. Viettel 10 60% 40% 10% 10% 1.2 50% 40% 30%
3. Da Nang 11 63% 27% 18% 18% 1.36 18% 63% 18%
4. Nam Dinh 10 70% 50% 20% 10% 1.5 60% 20% 10%
5. Hanoi FC 9 55% 0% 0% 0% 0.56 44% 11% 0%
6. Thanh Hoa 9 55% 22% 22% 0% 1 44% 33% 22%
7. Quang Nam 10 50% 30% 20% 10% 1.1 30% 50% 30%
8. Cong An Ha Noi 10 80% 20% 0% 0% 1 60% 40% 20%
9. Gia Lai 10 80% 50% 10% 0% 1.4 50% 50% 20%
10. Binh Dinh 9 66% 55% 0% 0% 1.22 55% 55% 44%
11. Hai Phong 10 70% 0% 0% 0% 0.7 20% 50% 0%
12. Song Lam Nghe An 10 60% 10% 0% 0% 0.7 30% 40% 10%
13. Ho Chi Minh 11 63% 18% 0% 0% 0.82 27% 45% 9%
14. Hong Linh Ha Tinh 10 70% 40% 10% 0% 1.2 50% 50% 30%
#▼ Team▼ P▼ +0.5▼ +1.5▼ +2.5▼ +3.5▼ Avg. G▼ GF▼ GA▼ BTTS▼
1. Binh Duong 11 81% 45% 9% 0% 1.36 45% 63% 27%
2. Viettel 10 80% 50% 20% 0% 1.5 60% 50% 30%
3. Da Nang 11 72% 36% 27% 18% 1.55 18% 63% 9%
4. Nam Dinh 10 50% 10% 0% 0% 0.6 30% 30% 10%
5. Hanoi FC 9 100% 66% 22% 0% 1.89 88% 44% 33%
6. Thanh Hoa 9 55% 33% 22% 0% 1.11 44% 33% 22%
7. Quang Nam 10 60% 30% 10% 10% 1.1 40% 50% 30%
8. Cong An Ha Noi 10 70% 40% 10% 0% 1.2 50% 40% 20%
9. Gia Lai 10 70% 40% 10% 10% 1.3 30% 50% 10%
10. Binh Dinh 9 66% 11% 0% 0% 0.78 11% 55% 0%
11. Hai Phong 10 70% 30% 30% 0% 1.3 40% 50% 20%
12. Song Lam Nghe An 10 90% 50% 30% 20% 1.9 40% 90% 40%
13. Ho Chi Minh 11 72% 36% 27% 9% 1.45 45% 54% 27%
14. Hong Linh Ha Tinh 10 60% 20% 0% 0% 0.8 50% 20% 10%