A detailed performance comparison between RFS and Grobinas : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of RFS and Grobinas , RFS 's overall team strength is rated at 224, while Grobinas 's is 92. In home matches, RFS 's team strength drops to 208, whereas Grobinas displays a team strength of 45 in away games.
Points | Home | Away | |
---|---|---|---|
1. RFS | 21 | - | - |
2. Auda | 19 | - | - |
3. Riga | 18 | - | - |
4. BFC Daugavpils | 16 | - | - |
5. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
6. Liepāja | 11 | - | - |
7. METTA | 11 | - | - |
8. SK Super Nova | 7 | - | - |
9. Tukums 2000 | 5 | - | - |
10. Grobiņas | 5 | - | - |
Points | Home | Away | |
---|---|---|---|
1. BFC Daugavpils | 19 | - | - |
2. Auda | 17 | - | - |
3. Liepāja | 16 | - | - |
4. RFS | 16 | - | - |
5. Riga | 15 | - | - |
6. Tukums 2000 | 13 | - | - |
7. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
9. METTA | 4 | - | - |
10. Grobiņas | 3 | - | - |
Points | Home | Away | |
---|---|---|---|
1. Auda | 21 | - | - |
2. Riga | 18 | - | - |
3. BFC Daugavpils | 14 | - | - |
4. SK Super Nova | 14 | - | - |
5. METTA | 13 | - | - |
6. RFS | 13 | - | - |
7. Jelgava | 10 | - | - |
8. Liepāja | 8 | - | - |
9. Grobiņas | 8 | - | - |
10. Tukums 2000 | 3 | - | - |
Points | Home | Away | |
---|---|---|---|
1. RFS | 21 | - | - |
2. Auda | 19 | - | - |
3. Riga | 18 | - | - |
4. BFC Daugavpils | 16 | - | - |
5. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
6. Liepāja | 11 | - | - |
7. METTA | 11 | - | - |
8. SK Super Nova | 7 | - | - |
9. Tukums 2000 | 5 | - | - |
10. Grobiņas | 5 | - | - |
Points | Home | Away | |
---|---|---|---|
1. BFC Daugavpils | 19 | - | - |
2. Auda | 17 | - | - |
3. Liepāja | 16 | - | - |
4. RFS | 16 | - | - |
5. Riga | 15 | - | - |
6. Tukums 2000 | 13 | - | - |
7. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
9. METTA | 4 | - | - |
10. Grobiņas | 3 | - | - |
Points | Home | Away | |
---|---|---|---|
1. Auda | 21 | - | - |
2. Riga | 18 | - | - |
3. BFC Daugavpils | 14 | - | - |
4. SK Super Nova | 14 | - | - |
5. METTA | 13 | - | - |
6. RFS | 13 | - | - |
7. Jelgava | 10 | - | - |
8. Liepāja | 8 | - | - |
9. Grobiņas | 8 | - | - |
10. Tukums 2000 | 3 | - | - |