RFS vs Grobinas
RFS and Grobinas Comparison: Goals Analysis
A detailed performance comparison between RFS and Grobinas : Overall performance, match results, and handicap statistics have been analyzed based on all encounters, first-half and second-half performances, as well as matches played at home and away.
When we evaluate the overall performances of RFS and Grobinas , RFS 's overall team strength is rated at 224, while Grobinas 's is 92. In home matches, RFS 's team strength drops to 208, whereas Grobinas displays a team strength of 45 in away games.
| All | Home | Away | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.67 | 2.25 | AVG goals | 2.80 | 3.56 |
| 78% | 75% | Goals Scored | 40% | 70% |
| 75% | 50% | Goals Conceded | 100% | 100% |
| 53% | 25% | Both teams to score | 40% | 70% |
| 53% | 25% | Over 2.5 Goals | 40% | 58% |
| 25% | 50% | Clean Sheet | 0% | 0% |
| 23% | 25% | Failed To Score | 60% | 30% |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RFS | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 19 | - | - |
| 3. Riga | 18 | - | - |
| 4. BFC Daugavpils | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 6. Liepāja | 11 | - | - |
| 7. METTA | 11 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 7 | - | - |
| 9. Tukums 2000 | 5 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 5 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. BFC Daugavpils | 19 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 17 | - | - |
| 3. Liepāja | 16 | - | - |
| 4. RFS | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Riga | 15 | - | - |
| 6. Tukums 2000 | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
| 9. METTA | 4 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Auda | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Riga | 18 | - | - |
| 3. BFC Daugavpils | 14 | - | - |
| 4. SK Super Nova | 14 | - | - |
| 5. METTA | 13 | - | - |
| 6. RFS | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 10 | - | - |
| 8. Liepāja | 8 | - | - |
| 9. Grobiņas | 8 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RFS | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 19 | - | - |
| 3. Riga | 18 | - | - |
| 4. BFC Daugavpils | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 6. Liepāja | 11 | - | - |
| 7. METTA | 11 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 7 | - | - |
| 9. Tukums 2000 | 5 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 5 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. BFC Daugavpils | 19 | - | - |
| 2. Auda | 17 | - | - |
| 3. Liepāja | 16 | - | - |
| 4. RFS | 16 | - | - |
| 5. Riga | 15 | - | - |
| 6. Tukums 2000 | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 12 | - | - |
| 8. SK Super Nova | 6 | - | - |
| 9. METTA | 4 | - | - |
| 10. Grobiņas | 3 | - | - |
| Points | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Auda | 21 | - | - |
| 2. Riga | 18 | - | - |
| 3. BFC Daugavpils | 14 | - | - |
| 4. SK Super Nova | 14 | - | - |
| 5. METTA | 13 | - | - |
| 6. RFS | 13 | - | - |
| 7. Jelgava | 10 | - | - |
| 8. Liepāja | 8 | - | - |
| 9. Grobiņas | 8 | - | - |
| 10. Tukums 2000 | 3 | - | - |
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Manchester City
Brighton & Hove Albion
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Tottenham
Brentford
Newcastle United
Manchester United
Fulham
Bournemouth
West Ham United
Everton
Leicester City
Crystal Palace
Ipswich Town
Wolverhampton
Southampton
Notes slip is empty.
To add an option to your notes slip, choose a percentage and make your selection.